U.S. SUPREME
COURT AGREES WITH SOUTH CAROLINA WICCAN DARLA KAYE WYNNE!
Regarding case 04-1052 before the Supreme Court
- Certiorari Denied. Translation: The Lower Court, in this case the
4th Circuit Court of appeals, ruling stands.
See Appeals Court Ruling Here.
Alternative Religions Educational Network, a
Pagan Civil and Religious Rights Organization is pleased to announce the
Supreme Court of The United States has declined to hear the Religious case
of: Town of Great Falls SC v Darla K Wynne.
In refusing to hear the appeal of the town regarding prayer, and in other
rulings that mandated removal of The 10 Commandments where they were not
connected to a secular display with other documents stating moral and civil
codes. The Supreme Court has again reaffirmed the "Wall of Separation"
between Church and State.
Over four years ago, after Darla Kaye Wynne moved to the quiet semi rural
town of Great Falls, South Carolina she attempted to be a good citizen by
attending town council meetings. After several meetings Ms. Wynne approached
the town council and requested that a more ecumenical for of opening prayer
be offered and offered to lead the opening prayer using her credentials as a
Wiccan High Priestess. While she had not expected an open arms welcome to
her request and offer she was taken aback by what did ensue. The reaction
ranged from derision, to unbelief to condemnation and to personal attacks on
her name, Religion, reputation and morals.
She reacted by seeking redress of wrongs from within the system and filing a
"Pro Se", of by self suit against the town to stop them from invoking a
Christian Deity solely. While she was able to battle it out by herself at
the beginning the South Carolina ACLU became involved and helped her obtain
an attorney and carried the suit through the entire court system.
Ms. Wynne, suffered several personal attacks, extreme vandalism to her home,
the death and maiming of pet animals she owned while asserting the
Constitutional Rights of those citizens of minority, non-mainstream
Religions. Darla Wynne stated, "I feel vindicated and sincerely hope this
can be put behind us, both the town and me, and we can continue on from here
to build a better future for all. One that offers diversity for
everyone's Religion." Ms. Wynne receives no monetary recompense for damage
to her property, the death of her pets nor for personal suffering from the
threats and harassment she has endured. She said, " A monetary award would
have not brought my pets back to life, nor eased the anxiety I suffered from
the treatment I apparently received at the hands of the Local Police
Department, nor would it have helped the citizens of Great Falls, as the
town is now obligated to pay my attorneys fees. However members of all
Religions, both non-mainstream and mainstream, can now understand their
complaints of Religious intolerance and harassment will be handled in a
better and more efficient way."