Is She a Traitor to
Family Values and America, a Wingnut or Just Plain Bat Sh*t Crazy?
The
Following Right Wing Individuals and Groups have made statements and performed
activities which by some standards indicate those actions are detrimental to the
United States of America. Click on each Name for The Truth....
If you are interested in
becoming Spiritually Enlightened...Click
HERE or on the Red Dragon Below.
You will be taken to a page which will reveal the gateway to
Enlightenment.
Click on the below
image and read the Quest - you will discover the secret
Grail of Immortality. Then click on and read the Way and finally The
Word. The three books are available in
Kindle
format. Go to Barnes and Noble for
Nook format.
Presented by: The Religious Freedom Coalition of the SouthEast
The following
web page is an excellent source of true Progressive and Liberal
Information which allows you to form honest opinions about
Neo-conservative and Conservative extremists who infest our government
and society:
http://professionalleft.blogspot.com/
We will also list others as they are created by the true patriots of
this country.
Question: "Separation
between Church and State." Who coined the Phrase? Give up?
Answer: Thomas Jefferson - one of the founding fathers of this
great Nation and a creator of the U.S. Constitution and the First Amendment
to that same Constitution. Thomas Jefferson, in 1802, wrote a Letter
to the Danbury Baptist Association, referring to the First Amendment to the
US Constitution. In it he said:
To messers. Nehemiah Dodge, Ephraim
Robbins, & Stephen S. Nelson, a committee of the Danbury Baptist
association in the state of Connecticut.
Gentlemen
The affectionate sentiments of esteem and
approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of
the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. my
duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests of my
constituents, & in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to
those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing.
Believing with you that religion is a
matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to
none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of
government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with
sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared
that their legislature should "make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church &
State. Adhering to this expression of the
supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I
shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments
which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no
natural right in opposition to his social duties.
I reciprocate your kind prayers for the
protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and
tender you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my
high respect & esteem.
Right Wing Extremism Part XV
Want to know the truth about statements made by Democrat and Republican
Politicians? Click on the following web sites to check on what is true
and what is false.
FactCheck.org
- Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of
Pennsylvania
Michele Bachmann
has always supported a extreme Conservative Christian position
especially when it comes to Church and State issues. It is
apparent from the data collected, that the first amendment is in
danger from her past and future actions.
Upon calling her office we find that Islam, Judaism,
Shintoism, Buddhism, Hinduism, or Wicca "..aren't "Real" religions."
What is a real religion, Mrs Bachmann? What you have been practicing?
Read the following and remember: "By their Works may they be known."
We believe that Michele will one day reside in Dante's ninth level of Hell!
(Remember it is best to investigate on your own when
looking at allegations about anyone. Don't believe us,
think for yourself and investigate for yourself! And remember, the
Freedom of Religion Coalition does not represent any political party nor do
we recommend any political candidate, nor are we involving ourselves in the
political process.
"Michele Bachmann is one of the great pulsars
of our times: a collapsed gravity well of unblinking stare. People
innocently walking down the street, are drawn into her orbit, helplessly
drawn in by how utterly dense she is. They cannot escape the
completely impenetrable mass of darkness surrounding her mind and become
totally crushed & moronized by her."
By a Friend of Religious Freedom
I've been scratching my head about two things lately.
One, how can someone who isn't a multimillionaire vote
Republican? Every platform they support is contrary to the
average working class citizen's needs. Two, how can a woman profess
to be a Christian when She obviously is a hypocrite and Liar? But
when I listen to people like Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, Sharon
Angle and Christine O'Donnell speak, it becomes clear how these
things exist and why they are glorified. Intelligence
is awareness of ignorance. Stupidity is ignorance of
ignorance. Now it all makes sense.
"It is better to be silent
and be thought a fool than to speakand remove all doubt. "Variously
attributed to Lincoln, Elbert Hubbard, Mark Twain, Benjamin Franklin
and Socrates.
Marine Corps Sgt. Ron Geste - Iraq
EXTREMIST
TEA PARTY REPUBLICANS ARE THE ENEMY AND TRAITORS TO AMERICA by R.
Blackbird
Extremist Tea Party Republicans are selfish, power hungry,
hateful of the poor, disloyal to the nation and its people, dishonest,
avaricious, scornful of the nation's history, the dignity of its
institutions, its standards of political morality, and its vision of
advancement for all the people. The Republicans love war as long as they
and theirs do not have to put on helmets and carry guns into the
fighting. They use lies to start wars that kill hundreds of thousands of
innocents and thousands of our own military service people. They love
massive war-time profits, unavailable to their rich masters if war is
absent.
Those Extremist Republicans hate the rest of us, which
they must, in order to pass away from themselves and onto us, the
financial burdens and losses their crimes, schemes and thefts cause.
They are prolific, incessant, and destructive liars. They are
blasphemers for they insist that their hateful and destructive deeds are
the work of God. They are apostates for they gleefully attack the poor,
the immigrants, the old and the sick, of whom God has commanded all of
us to be mindful.
There is no reasoning with them, for all their logic is built on
false premises. There is no appealing to them for honor's sake for they
have lost all sense of shame and have no honor, there is no appealing to
them for the nation's sake for that it what they hate the most.
WASHINGTON -- If you
thought evangelical preaching needed longer hair, tattoos,
nu-metal drumming, and a ton of hate speech directed at gays,
then
Bradlee Dean
is your guy.
He's very much Rep. Michele Bachmann's guy.
Bachmann, whose district covers Dean's suburban Minnesota
headquarters, didn't just endorse Dean, but has prayed for him
and his ministry, You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International,
in a clip
"Would you keep them from evil?" Bachmann
prays. "Would you keep them from pain?" Finally she
begs the All Mighty to "pour a triple blessing on this ministry"
and expand it ten fold.
Bachmann may come to regret her superfandom
for Dean. One news outlet has already
suggested that Dean might be
her Jeremiah Wright. It's easy to make such a comparison.
Dean has amassed quite a
video log
on YouTube of ultra right wing conspiracy theories about New
World Orders and made bigoted remarks directed at the LGBT
community, Muslims and President Barack Obama. In Dean's
world Hitler was gay and Obama is, of course, equal to Osama bin
Laden.
Dean refused to comment about his association
with Bachmann. A representative told The Huffington Post:
"We're not tying ourselves with her... He's not interested in
doing an interview."
The Bachmann campaign also had no comment.
But unlike Obama's connection with Rev.
Wright, Bachmann
Does the draconian mandate of Old Testament law drive
Michele and Marcus Bachmann's war on LGBT people?
July 15, 2011 |
People who don't like LGBT people
often cite a range of reasons for their disdain. Take
GOP presidential contender Rep. Michele Bachmann,
R-Minn., and her husband, Marcus. Gay people are
"barbarians," Marcus Bachmann
And then there's the Bible, which calls for the death
penalty for men who have sex with each other. While
Bachmann has never made that call herself, her religious
views appear to be heavily influenced by a theological
strain known as Christian Reconstructionism, which in
matters of sexuality and gender relations places great
emphasis on the draconian law of the Old Testament Book
of Leviticus.
Writing for Religion Dispatches,
Sarah Posner this week exposed
the Reconstructionist roots of the law school Bachmann
attended at Oral Roberts University. The language and
theory of Christian Reconstructionism turns up
frequently in Bachmann's speeches.
In the 1970s, as Posner tells it, Oral Roberts
University, founded by the famous Pentecostal faith
healer, wanted to launch a law school, but at that time,
no real model existed for such a school of jurisprudence
designed to serve an evangelical student body. Roberts
brought in Harvard Law School graduate Herb Titus, a
student of the work of John Rousas Rushdoony, the father
of Christian Reconstructionism, to build the law
school's program.
Titus would go on
to become the 1996 presidential candidate for Howard
Phillips’ Constitution Party (then called the U.S.
Taxpayers Party). Despite its secular-sounding name, the
party's mission was, according to Posner, “restor[ing]
American jurisprudence to its biblical foundations and
limit[ing] the federal government to its Constitutional
boundaries.”
That merging of ideas and sensibilities -- the
expressive Pentacostal with the stern and austere
Reconstructionist -- was truly radical at the time. To
the liberal mind, all Christian evangelism tends to look
the same. But it wasn’t until politics mandated a union
of convenience that one would find the likes of Herb
Titus, or, for that matter, the fundamentalist Baptist
Jerry Falwell and the charismatic dominionist Pat
Robertson, playing on the same team.
The logic in bringing Titus to ORU was likely this:
Pentacostalism, though rooted in Christian theology, has
more emphasis on the spiritual expression of the divine
through the human body than on codification. Yes, the
mores are conservative and gender-bound, but
Pentacostalism is about the visceral experience of the
power of that conservative, male God as a transformative
force. Christian Reconstructionism is based on a text,
the Institutes of Biblical Law, that reads like
one long legal and philosophical argument for the law of
the ancient Hebrew Bible.
If you listen closely to the rhetoric
of both Michele and Marcus Bachmann, particularly on the
subject of “homosexuality,” you find the
Reconstructionist worldview in their word choices.
Marcus Bachmann’s use of the term “barbaric” to describe
gay people comes from the Reconstructionist notion that
societies that permit practices -- especially sexual
practices -- that are proscribed by the Bible are
inherently pagan. John Rushdoony did not allow for the
absence of religion or a secular society: whatever law
governed a society, he writes in Institutes of
Biblical Law, constituted its “religion.” Because
homosexuality was practiced in pre-Christian, non-Jewish
societies, those who practice it today are inherently
“pagan.” For images of such pagan societies, Rushdoony
turns to those cultures that truly had barbaric
practices, such as the Romans.
Michele Bachmann’s assertion that LGBT people have
fallen into “sexual anarchy” also echoes Rushdoony, who
writes of homosexuality as an act of “sexual chaos,”
included in a list that includes bestiality, incest and
“general depradation.” Worse than that, Rushdoony
asserts, homosexuality is a corrupt “theology,” because,
he writes, it promotes “war against God.” When Michele
Bachmann
told attendees of the 2004
National Education Conference
that to use the the word “gay” to describe homosexuality
is “part of Satan,” she’s invoking the story of that
ultimate war against God -- that waged by Lucifer, the
fallen angel.
Her sense of urgency about pushing gay culture to the
margins, as evidenced in her comments about the dangers
of allowing gay teachers near children, is expressed in
sterner terms by Rushdoony, who writes, “Because of the
extensive control by homosexuals over fashions and
publications, the mind and appearance of Western
countries have been radically infected by the parasitic
homosexual culture.” That culture, in Rushdoony’s terms
-- and the minds of many evangelicals who have been
influenced by his writings -- is waging and actual
spiritual war on God -- just as Lucifer did.
As the week unfolded for Bachmann, scrutiny turned to
the Christian
counseling business of her
husband, Marcus, who
holds a Ph.D. in clinical psychology from Union Graduate
Institute, and a master’s degree in education and
counseling from Rev. Pat Robertson’s Regent University,
and his practice of “ex-gay” or so-called “reparative”
therapy: a discredited practice whereby counselors work
with clients to turn them from gay to straight. (Pat
Robertson’s dominionist theology is also informed by
Christian Reconstructionism.) Marcus Bachmann at first
denied that his counseling practice employed such
therapy, but
then admitted to it
when John Becker of the LGBT-rights group
Truth Wins Out
proved as much with his
undercover investigation.
At the same time, the Nation
published an expose by
Mariah Blake based on the story of a young man who says
that, when he was a teenager, his parents took him to
Bachmann’s clinic for just such “therapy.”
Marcus Bachmann obviously knew that exposure of his
practice’s use of “ex-gay” therapy would play badly for
him, and it does not seem to form the bulk of his
practice. So, why take the risk? Well, if you live to
please a stern and unforgiving God, and believe that war
is being made against that God by gay people as they
practice their gayness, you might think yourself a hero
for taking the chance.
A long section of Bachmann’s
remarks
to that conference are devoted to detailing the many
ways in which gay culture has become mainstreamed,
evincing strong echoes of Rushdoony’s complaint against
the “infection” of Western culture with “homosexual”
ways.
In her
talk to the National Education
Conference,
Michele Bachmann, who has long been a critic of public
schools, complained of the attention given the murder of
Matthew Shepard, who was killed in Laramie, Wyoming in
1998, for being gay. She compared Shepard's murder to
that of a 13-year-old boy, Jesse Dirkhising, who was
sexually abused and murdered in 1999 by two adult male
pedophiles -- friends of his parents -- who were also
lovers. Bachmann complained that the Dirkhising case had
not received the same level of attention as the Shepard
lynching “because Jesse did not serve the purpose of
those sympathetic to homosexuality.”
In Rushdoony’s Institutes of Biblical Law, he
asserts that other anti-gay psychological theories are
mistaken in their assumption that homosexuality is a
form of immaturity and arrested development. No way, he
claims, “deliberate and mature warfare against God marks
the homosexual.”
“God’s penalty is death,” he continues, “and a godly
order will enforce it.”
Beeryblog has obtained a video announcement soon to be
released by the Bachmann Campaign regarding Marcus
Bachmann’s role in a Bachmann Administration should his
‘wife’ win the 2012 election:
First posted on
huffingtonpost.com HUFFPOST COMEDY:
7/17/11
One thing is abundantly clear: Bill
Maher is not afraid of offending you.
Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin are
an interesting force in American politics. They are the
Republicans progressives love to not take seriously at
all. They are also the ones that "people who know" say
you shouldn't underestimate. But more importantly,
perhaps, they afford conservatives the unique
opportunity to call liberals sexist.
Case in point: Bill Maher has been
called out -- by both the left and the right -- for
referring to Sarah Palin with a sexist epithet during
one of his comedy shows. That incident has been used by
conservative commentators as evidence that liberals real
beef with both Palin and Bachmann has to do with their
being women, not terrible candidates.
But in true Maher fashion, the "Real
Time" host responded to the critiques by taking those
sexist claims and raising them an "inbred weirdo" and a
shot at Jesus and the entire Christian faith.
Because you can't fight fire without gasoline,
obviously.
So what do you think? Does Maher have
a point here?
First Posted: 7/13/11 04:23 PM ETUpdated:
7/13/11 05:36 PM ET
Republican presidential candidate Fred Karger, the first openly-gay
contender to vie for his party's nomination, sharply criticized rival GOP
hopeful Michele Bachmann in an exclusive
interview with the Michigan Messenger
published online on Wednesday.
Karger took aim at Bachmann over controversial
therapy methods
reportedly practiced at her husband's Minnesota
clinic.
Last week, The Nation
reported that the clinic practiced reparative
therapy, which the publication explains treats being
gay as a curable disorder. When
asked to share her opinion of such practices and
whether they are used at her husband's clinic by a
reporter for WQAD, an ABC affiliate, Bachmann
declined to address the matter.
A
report released by ABC News earlier this week
offered an inside look at the practices and treatment
offered at the center.
"She's a liar and now that she's been busted, she's
trying to divert attention away from her lies," Karger
said of Bachmann to the Messenger in
speaking out on the matter. "She is just another
hypocrite and bigot."
Bachmann has been clear about her opposition to
marriage equality. Last week, the conservative
congresswoman
signed The Family Leader's "Marriage Vow"
pledge, which entails supporting a "federal Marriage
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which protects the
definition of marriage as between one man and one
woman."
"What I signed was a statement that affirms marriage
as an important part of our nation," said Bachmann
during an
appearance on Fox News' "Hannity" on Tuesday night.
"I think that marriage is very important. It is the
fundamental unit of our government. And I think it is
important that we do uphold marriage and also the
family."
Bachmann's campaign - and Bachmann herself - has
declined to answer repeated requests from CBS News
for an explanation of her beliefs about
homosexuality. But in 2004, when she was a state
senator, Bachmann gave an hour-long speech outlining
her opinions at the time.
In speaking out at the time, Bachmann described gay
individuals as being part of "Satan." Below, an audio
clip of what the Minnesota Republican had to say
via CBS News.
There she goes again! Michele Bachmann, the GOP contender whose
name's on everyone's lips has not only announced her staunch
refusal to raise the debt ceiling limit, but she's
made news
by signing a long "pro-marriage" pledge with anti-porn,
anti-Sharia-law, anti-abortion and anti gay-marriage subsets
in its brief pages, (pdf
link) as well as a nasty little opening paragraph about slavery
at the beginning, implying that African-American children
were actually better off when
they were considered property.
The passage that sums of the
spirit of this pledge with its its hand-wringing, moralizing,
and lumping together of a whole host of inappropriately-linked
issues is here:
Humane protection of women
and the innocent fruit of conjugal intimacy – our next
generation of American children – from human trafficking,
sexual slavery, seduction into promiscuity, and all forms of
pornography and prostitution,
Seriously,
members of the GOP need to stop using slavery as a metaphor for
everything under the sun and drumming up the nonexistent threat
of Sharia takeover. Both increasingly frequent tactics are
offensive to the extreme.
The policy implications for Bachmann's signing the pledge are
also big: abortion and gay marriage bans at the national level,
a possible pornography ban and more. She
may claim the election is about the
economy, but like dozens of
GOPers before her, she's riding the cultural conservatism
hobbyhorse as far as it can go.
From
complaining about her house being egged to filing a report that
she was being held “against my will” in a public restroom,
Michele Bachmann has left a trail of police reports showing a
seldom-seen side of a presidential candidate.
Excerpt from an article
by Marc Caputo at MiamiHerald.com on July 11, 2011
Jeff Baenen / AP
Photo - In
this June 18, 2011 photo,
Republican presidential hopeful
Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.,
is showered with glitter after
speaking at the AFP RightOnline
Conference in Minneapolis. This
year, for some liberal
activists, the guerrilla tactic
of choice is a shower of glitter
tossed from close range.
With a penchant for tough
talk and polarizing positions, Republican presidential
contender Michele Bachmann is a magnet for controversy — and
there’s a trail of police reports to prove it.
She and her staff over the
years have requested police protection or investigations
when her house was egged; when protesters threw glitter on
her or held up critical signs; when her campaign yard signs
were stolen; when a man wrote an email perceived as a
threat; and when she screamed that two women were holding
her hostage “against my will” in a city hall restroom.
The series of police
reports from the Stillwater Police Department and the
Washington County Sheriff’s Office in Minnesota show a side
of a candidate rarely seen on the campaign trail, where
Bachmann has described herself as having a "titanium spine."
Bachmann’s campaign and
congressional offices wouldn’t comment, but her fellow
Minnesota Republicans say they’re not surprised by the
reports.
“Michele Bachmann is
someone who tells it like it is with the courage of her
convictions,” said Tony Sutton, state chairman of Republican
Party of Minnesota. “There will be people on the other side
who will react in an inappropriate way. There are a lot of
liberals who can’t cope with the fact that she’s an
outspoken conservative who sticks by her guns.”
But those who have been a
her target when she calls the cops say Bachmann doesn’t walk
the talk.
“She is paranoid,” said
Brad Trandem, a Lakeland, Minn. resident who excoriated
Bachmann in an email this year, only to face investigators.
“She does all this criticism of other people’s lives and
talks about how people should be ‘armed and dangerous.’ But
then someone says something critical about her and she calls
the police.”
In Trandem’s case,
Bachmann’s staff who forwarded his correspondence to U.S.
Capitol Police with the headline “Email Threat to Rep.
Bachmann.”
At issue, this last
sentence of the 128-word email referring to Dr. Marcus
Bachmann: “I would also keep a little closer tabs on the
dear hubby if I were you.”
Bachmann’s husband has
become the focus of controversy himself, suggesting in a
radio interview that homosexuals were “barbarians (who) need
to be educated.” Though the Bachmanns have denied it, gay
activists say the Christian counselor is associated with a
type of therapy aimed at stopping homosexuality through
spiritual training.
Trandem said his email
wasn’t intended to threaten anyone, and he wasn’t suggesting
the congresswoman’s husband was gay. He said he was just
drawing attention to what he sees as the hypocrisy of social
conservatives who accuse others of the offenses they commit.
Trandem’s email, though,
came a day after a watershed moment in American political
history: The Jan. 8 shooting spree of Jared Lee Loughner,
accused of killing six and wounding 14 others – including
Tucson Congresswoman Gabbie Giffords. In his letter, Trandem
referred to “tea baggers” and suggested conservative talk of
armed revolt was to blame for the Tucson rampage. Loughner,
it turns out, was mentally ill and wasn’t a tea party
member.
Capitol police referred
the email to the Washington County sheriffs investigators,
who determined Trandem posed no threat. Capitol police
wouldn’t comment.
A spokesperson for another
congresswoman and friend of Giffords, Debbie Wasserman
Schultz, said Bachmann’s staff acted appropriately in
referring the matter to Capitol Police, who have asked
staffers to report any suspicious or potentially threatening
information.
“I wouldn’t fault her or
here staff,” said Schultz spokesman, Jonathan Beeton.
“Whether the incidents happen in a bathroom or wherever,
it’s better to err on the side of caution.”
Beeton said Wasserman
Schultz, head of the national Democratic Party, has police
protection when she has events in South Florida, which is
partly the result of the Giffords shooting.
But even before the
shooting, Bachmann sometimes worried about the intentions of
her constituents. The eight police reports concerning
Bachmann exceed the number of reports connected to
Miami-Dade’s congressional delegation and calls to Wasserman
Schultz’ home, according to South Florida police.
Though her
social-conservatism has helped inspire loathing on the left,
it’s a potent force in a GOP primary. Some polls show she’s
leading in Iowa and is now running in second place to Mitt
Romney in Florida.
In April 2005, Bachmann
held a meeting at Scandia City Hall in her state senate
district. But she cut the meeting short when the topic
turned to gay marriage. Two Minnesota voters, Pamela
Arnold and Nancy Cosgriff, wanted the congresswoman to
answer their questions.
Cosgriff, a former nun,
said she wanted to know about the “theological
underpinnings” of Bachmann’s stance on gay marriage. While
trying to get a response, Cosgriff said she followed
Bachmann into the restroom where the congresswoman washed
her hands but wouldn’t respond. Palmer then came in and
asked about education as well.
“You have to get away from
the door because I have to go,” Bachmann said she asked
repeatedly, according to a police report.
When Arnold tried to get
an answer, Bachmann yelled “help me! Someone get me out of
here!” Bachmann told police. Arnold and Cosgriff told
police Bachmann said something like “Help, help you’re
holding me against my will!”
Said Cosgriff: “I was
amazed and concerned when she erupted in this emotional
outburst without provocation… I tried to apologize for any
misunderstanding.”
As the startled women
looked on, Bachmann ran out of the restroom. She later filed
a police report, which an investigator described as a
“possible false imprisonment” inquiry. The women weren’t
prosecuted because the investigator determined that there
were “conflicting accounts” and a “lack of any strong
corroborating evidence that would suggest criminal
activity.”
The year before, Bachmann
and a Republican state representative sponsored a proposed
Minnesota constitutional amendment to stop gay marriage.
State Capitol activists put the lawmakers’ pictures and home
phone numbers on placards and pamphlets that said “shame”
and “sponsoring hate crimes legislation.”
Bachmann called the
Stillwater police “in case she starts to get threatening
phone calls,” a report said.
Gay activists also hunted
her down in Minnesota, where someone tried to throw glitter
on the congresswoman as a protest on June 18 — shortly after
she declared her presidential candidacy. Bachmann barely
reacted publicly. But she called the Capitol police, who
notified the sheriff’s office of the glittering and a tweet
someone posted that suggested “they would be using guns as
their right.”
Separately, Stillwater
police have also investigated the theft of her campaign yard
signs in 2002. And she called them to her house in 2007 when
she complained her house was “substantially egged” for the
second time.
None of the inquiries
resulted in arrests.
“Michele is engaged and
she’s articulate and she is not one to back down,” said
Scott Fischbach, a Bachmann constituent and executive
director Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life. “They’ve
tried everything to stop her,” he said. “They’ve thrown the
kitchen sink at her.”
Michele
Bachmann's stepsister, Helen LaFave,
celebrates Obama's inauguration
Not all of
Michele Bachmann's family shares her far-right
views. As the media has been aware for sometime, the
Minnesota Republican has an openly gay stepsister,
Helen LaFave. While shying from the spotlight,
LaFave has publicly opposed Bachmann's anti-gay
stance since the congresswoman proposed a
gay-marriage ban in the Minnesota Senate (as the
Daily Beast
reported earlier this year).
LaFave's political
differences from Bachmann's go beyond the spheres of
LGBT rights, however, as a short clip discovered on
Vimeo suggests. Captured outside the U.S. Capitol in
2009 when Obama was sworn in, the video shows a
friendly LaFave (who appears with her long-term
partner Nia Wronski) telling the videographer of her
excitement about the "reawakening of the country"
and the "start of something new." Wronski expresses
a desire to see more barriers broken down.
Interestingly,
LaFave mentions that she drove down to the event
from Minneapolis with six other family members and
received tickets "through one of the
congresspeople." Bachmann was already a U.S.
congresswoman by this time (she assumed office in
2007), though we have no idea if she helped her
stepsister gain access.
Watch the video
below, posted to Vimeo by Julie Phillips, to see the
ebullient LaFave and Wronski in 2009:
Click HERE to listen to Keith Olbermann and Janeane Garofalo
weigh in on Michele Bachmann's husband, Marcus Bachmann and the
fact that most people who are as vehemently anti-gay as he is,
usually turn out to be someone who is gay themselves and has
some real issues with their own sexuality.
I was glad to see someone
finally addressing the issue of just how damaging the type
of "therapy" Bachmann and his clinic are using is to anyone
who is unfortunate enough to find themselves subjected to
it.
Janeane also thankfully
called the "tea party" exactly what it is -- an astroturf
Republican re-branding effort that is not grass roots but
sponsored by a whole lot of big money. And as they noted,
their efforts are apparently fizzling if this is any
indication. We can only hope.
Organizers for the
Freedom Jamboree, billed as the national tea party straw
poll convention, announced on Wednesday that the event
has been canceled due to low attendance. The conference
had pulled in two of Minnesota most controversial
figures, presidential candidate Michele Bachmann and
rightwing preacher Bradlee Dean. It was also being
organized by Iowa’s Bob Vander Plaats, whose
organization, The Family Leader, sparked an uproar in
the state after it released a presidential pledge on
marriage.
“Everything was set
up,” said William Temple, one of the organizers, told
the Kansas City Star. “It was just the tea parties
themselves weren’t prepared to spend the money to travel
and bring their families.”
Roll Call notes that
the organizers also had subpar fundraising in addition
to low attendance, and it’s the second tea party
convention in two years to be canceled because of low
attendance.
Michele Bachmann continues
to be the hottest brand in the GOP presidential contest. She's
performing strong in Iowa,
but the biggest news this week is
how well she's doing in New Hampshire.
Although New Hampshire is long thought to be a safe haven for Mitt
Romney, Bachmann's been muscling her way into the conversation and
up the poll rankings. She's now in second place, trailing by single
digits, and closing in on Romney. And if Bachmann prevails in Iowa,
she need only perform respectably in the Granite State to get her
ticket punched to the primaries beyond. Right now, if the Bachmann
camp has a concern, it's that
it's become too big, too soon.
But that's a pretty nice problem to have.
Bachmann's newfound popularity has led the media to
re-scrutinize her personal life
though it's uncertain if they're going to tell the world
anything they don't already know. Hey, did you hear that
Bachmann hates gay people?
Did you know that she's out there
on the culty fringes of the Christian
universe? Yes, you did, because you
have been alive for at least the past four years. This is the sort
of media coverage that, while critical in its bent, won't bother the
Bachmann campaign at all. The only people who will be turned off by
this stuff are the already-turned off. For devotees, the media
attention will only harden their resolve to turn out for the
Minnesota representative.
Perhaps less well known is that fact that Bachmann has staked
out some hawkish territory on foreign policy and the war in
Afghanistan.
As Josh Rogin reports:
Bachmann, meanwhile, in a marked and
seemingly calculated way, has come out forcefully seeking to
separate out national security from the Tea Party's
cost-cutting, budget-slashing, government-shrinking agenda.
In a June 28 interview with NPR, Bachmann criticized Obama's
announcement to draw down troops in Afghanistan, accused the
president of placing political considerations ahead of
national security, and implored the president to follow the
advice of outgoing International Security Assistance Force
commander Gen. David Petraeus, who recommended a slow pace
of withdrawal.
"Gen. Petraeus, who's in charge of winning the war effort in
Afghanistan, understands that we need to win the war on
terror. We must never forget that 9/11 was hatched in the
caves and the mountains of Afghanistan. The Taliban has a
presence there. Al Qaeda has a presence there. We must
defeat them in their backyard. And it's important that Gen.
Petraeus and [Lt.] Gen. [John] Allen have the resources that
they need to be successful in southern Afghanistan and then
also in eastern Afghanistan," she said.
If that sounds extremely close to the position of the
leading GOP hawk senators, such as McCain, that's because it
is. In fact, Bachmann met with McCain in late June to
discuss national security issues and Afghanistan, according
to two sources familiar with the meeting. That's not to say
she is taking his advice directly, but she is seeking his
counsel.
Of course, as Ben Smith
notes,
she's taken a non-interventionist stance
on Libya. But if she's seeking out
advice from McCain, there may be something to her "unifying" pledge,
after all. That doesn't mean, however, that she's ultimately going
to be seen as electable by independents, who will continue to see
her as a person who routinely
says supremely daffy things.
CARL QUINTANILLA (CNBC): Does it strike you that
as the unemployment rate goes up that your chances of winning office
also go up?
MICHELE
BACHMANN: Well, that could be. Again, I hope so.
At least you've got
to give her credit for being honest. Not many Republicans are willing to
publicly admit that they hope sabotaging the economy will help them win
in the 2012 elections.
Michelle Bachman speaks at a Tea Party Rally
in Washinton DC, March 31, 2011. (Photo:
markn3tel)
Travel, they say, improves the
mind, a notion once rightly castigated in song by the late, great Noel
Coward. It's "an irritating platitude," he wrote, "which frankly, entre
nous, is far from ever true."
And yet there is some truth to
it, although sailing on a celebratory birthday cruise up the Canadian
Maritimes and along the St. Lawrence River, as I have been with friends
these last few days, had the potential to confirm Sartre's belief that
hell is other people.
Add to that qualms instilled by
my girlfriend Pat's semi-serious theory that frequent outbreaks of food
poisoning on cruise ships actually may be the result of chemical and
biological warfare testing by the government. Think about it - boat
passengers are the perfect research targets, confined in a relatively
small space, unsuspecting, isolated from the rest of the population. Why
not lob a little concentrated E. coli in their direction and see what
happens?
In truth, it may rank close to
the belief that tornadoes would cease to exist if there were no trailer
parks for them to tear up, but so be it. Throughout our voyage, company
remained unhellish and untouched by gastroenteritis - or worse.
In any case, one of the
mind-broadening advantages of travel is to read the local papers - if
you can find them these days - and learn what's on the mind of people in
the places you land on. Sometimes, their interests are highly parochial;
sometimes, they strongly reflect our own. On Canada's Prince Edward
Island (PEI), locals were obsessing over the imminent visit to the
island of Prince William and Kate Middleton. In the brief time we were
there, townspeople of the provincial capital Charlottetown frantically
repainted crosswalks, mowed lawns, clipped hedges and polished anything
that didn't move, all in anticipation of the royal arrival.
Canada's national newspaper, The
Globe and Mail, even reported that in advance of the visit a fishery
museum not too far from Charlottetown had gotten hold of two rare blue
lobsters. "We were going to name [one lobster] Blue Boy, but then we got
thinking why not honor these special guests coming to PEI," a local
known around the island as the Bearded Skipper told the paper. "Not
everyone can see the royal couple but they can come to the museum and
touch Will and Kate." Curtsying, no doubt, as they approach with bibs
and bowls of melted butter.
Other news was more serious and
familiar. Discrimination against Muslims in Toronto. Flooding in the
province of Manitoba out west mirrored flooding of the Missouri River in
the American Midwest. Canada's declining postal service was back in
action after several rotating job actions by labor across the country
were followed by a lockout - a conservative government going after
unionized civil service workers, just like home. Unemployment was at its
lowest in more than two years ...
Say that again? The US rate rose
to 9.1 percent in May from 9.0 percent in April, with the release of the
June numbers due this Friday. But as per a June 10 dispatch from
Reuters, "The unemployment rate in Canada fell to the lowest level since
January 2009 in May as the number of jobs increased by 22,300, an island
of healthy data in a sea of recent figures showing tepid North American
economic growth.
"Statistics Canada reported on
Friday that the jobless rate dropped from 7.6 percent in April to 7.4
percent in May, a number last seen when Canada was falling into
recession at the start of 2009."
Republican presidential
candidate Michele Bachmann celebrated the news with a tweet: "Lesson in
economic recovery: Consider Canada. No stimulus & unemployment is 20%
lower than US."
But Representative Bachmann
misinterprets Canada's history as thoroughly as she mangles America's.
Eric Kleefeld of the progressive web site Talking Points Memo wrote,
"The absolute fact of the matter is that Canada undertook a thorough
stimulus program under Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his
Conservative Party - one that was relatively smaller than the one here,
but given the apples and oranges situation of having different economic
needs, it was still a very considerable one."
The amount was $40 billion,
Canadian. Adjusting for conversion, relative purchasing power,
per-capita GDP and the much larger population of the United States - we
have almost ten times as many people - this was roughly equivalent to a
stimulus of over US $360 billion - less than half the Obama stimulus,
but the recession did not hit Canada as badly as it crippled the US.
Why? Resurgence in demand for
Canadian gas, oil and other minerals, for one thing (including asbestos
- Canada just blocked again the listing of chrysotile asbestos fibers as
a hazardous chemical under the UN's Rotterdam Convention). But also, as
Kleefeld notes, "One reason for Canada's resilience was having years of
strict banking regulations, which fostered a more stable financial
system."
He cites an Economist article
from May 2010: "Jim Flaherty, the finance minister, attributes Canada's
strong performance to its 'boring' financial system. Prodded by tight
regulation, the banks were much more conservative in their lending than
their American counterparts. Those that did dabble in subprime loans
were able to withdraw quickly. This prudence kept a lid on house prices
while those in America were soaring, but it paid off when the bust hit."
Note that the banking
regulations predate the rule of conservative Prime Minister Harper, and
that last year the six biggest Canadian banks still managed to rake in
$20 billion in profits. This may come as a bit of a shock to Bachmann,
who has included complete repeal of our barely year-old, Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act as part of her presidential
campaign platform.
In her capacity as a
representative from Minnesota, one assumes that Representative Bachmann
has traveled more than once to our northern neighbor. Still, a return
visit might not only improve the mind, but also help her brush up on
Canadian history. On the other hand, the shock of finding out that
Canada has a single-payer, government-run health care program might
cause her to implode.
Michael Winship is senior writing
fellow at Demos, former senior writer at "Bill
Moyers Journal" on PBS and current president of the
Writers Guild of America, East.
ABC's Jimmy Kimmel announced Tuesday a new educational film by
Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann.
The Minnesota Republican has recently
mistaken John Wayne
for John Wayne Gacy and
insisted John Quincy
Adams was a Founding Father.
"I like when politicians who screw up go find like a
single sentence in the back of a high school history book and then use that
as their defense, as if that's what they meant the whole time," Kimmel said.
"And that's what she's doing. And not only is Michele Bachmann sticking to
this Founding Father thing, she's working on -- I don't know if it's a
documentary or some sort of educational film, but it's something to teach
kids about American history."
"In 1775, Thomas Jefferson and John Quincy
Adams set sail across the Delaware River to tell the King of
England they had enough of his liberal agenda," an actor posing
as Bachmann explained in the film. "King James called Napoleon
and together they decided to kill America."
"They sent the Nina, the Piñata and the
Santa Maria to fight. But then, George Washington and Abraham
Lincoln gathered an army to turn back the big government
dictators. They told Paul Revere to ride his horse to Frodo. But
then, John Wilkes Booth showed up and killed Lincoln. But there
was still hope, because Jesus appeared on the face of the
Liberty Bell and he froze John Wilkes Booth in carbonite. And
the liberal homosexuals sailed back to their gay country, while
Americans claimed their land and drank beer. And that's how
freedom was born."
The GOP presidential candidate's claims that
her family received no federal support are unraveling Video
Excerpt from an article on salon.com posted
by
Joan Walsh
June 29, 2011
AP
NBC News revealed Tuesday night that
although GOP presidential candidate Michele Bachmann has
repeatedly denied benefiting from federal funding to her
family's farm or her husband's clinic, the Bachmanns
received $137,000 in Medicaid funds over the last five
years to Marcus Bachmann's "Christian family clinic,"
along with $24,000 in federal funds to train clinic
employees. That's on top of the subsidies that
went to a family farm in which she's named as a partner,
which received more than $250,000 in federal funds.
Bachmann continues to deny benefiting from the farm,
although she's claimed income from the family business
on her congressional disclosure forms.
I'm not sure that Bachmann's insisting
that she's right in calling John Quincy Adams a founder
-- his father, John, was a founder; John Quincy was only
9 at the signing of the Declaration of Independence --
is going to hurt her with her devoted base.
Politifact.com says Bachmann has “the worst record of
making false statements of any of the leading
contenders," yet her poll standing continues to rise.
But allegations that she either lied or misrepresented
her family's cut of federal funds from programs she's
promising to slash could hurt her badly. Left or
right, voters don't like liars or hypocrites. The
gaffes about John Quincy Adams and John Wayne Gacy are
funny but much less important than this reporting.
I talked about Bachmann's latest
challenge on MSNBC with Rev. Al Sharpton, Chris Hayes
and Michelle Goldberg:
Joan Walsh
is Salon's editor at large. More:
Joan Walsh
“They're casting their problem on
society. And you know, there is no such
thing as society. There are individual
men and women, and there are families”
"...more than ever, Washington IS the
problem, and the real solutions will
come from our businesses, our
communities, our schools and the most
basic and powerful unit of all-our
families."
A bloody-minded
True Believer's faith in the Godliness of their
dogma.
An unvarnished loathing for all opposition.
An boundless contempt for government.
A ruthless eagerness to sacrifice the lives and
futures of the poor, the sick, the weak, the
elderly and the outsider on the altar of
unfettered oligarchy.
Slavishly loyal acolytes who happily blind
themselves to the misery and ugliness their
ideology leaves in its wake.
And screw the facts when they get in the way.
Regardless of what feckless, dorm-room "real"
conservatives may tell themselves to balm their
wounded egos over being wrong about everything
their entire adult lives, these are the real
pillars of Conservatism, over here and over
there, then and now.
Bachmann stated
that she would not vote to raise the debt ceiling
"until I see a serious legitimate reduction in
spending." When questioned about the possible
disastrous financial consequences of a failure by
the United States to make good on its obligations,
she blithely dismissed any possible negative
fallout.
"The interest
on the debt can easily be paid for .... and that
would mean that we wouldn't default. Then we
would continue the full faith and credit of the
United States. I think these are scare tactics
by the Obama administration, because clearly
this is the Obama debt, this is the Obama
deficit and this is the very poor working Obama
economy. "
1)
The interest can easily be paid
for ...LIE
Bachmann is
making the argument here that the U.S. can choose to
pay its creditors -- the various holders of
government-issued debt -- first, and thus not
technically be in default. It's an open question
whether credit rating agencies and bond investors
will accept that technicality. China might get paid
in full, but millions of Americans would immediate
get stiffed. Of course, Bachmann doesn't mention
that choosing such a strategy would require
extraordinarily severe and immediate spending cuts
--
around $4.5 billion a day
-- in programs such as Social Security, Medicare,
defense, unemployment benefits, et cetera.
Economists generally agree -- the negative economic
impacts of such drastic short-term cuts in
government spending would almost surely drive the
U.S. straight back into recession.
Furthermore, a
failure to reach agreement on the debt limit would
guarantee bond market jitters, pushing up interest
rates and raising the cost at which the U.S.
government can borrow funds -- and thus end up
increasing the deficit.
2) Because
clearly this is the Obama debt, this is the Obama
deficit...LIE
I'm
reasonably sure
I'll be debunking this blatant
falsehood when I'm
on my deathbed. But once more into the breach! When
Obama took office, the deficit was already $1
trillion -- a result of Bush's tax cuts, unpaid-for
wars and prescription drug benefit giveaways, TARP,
and the recession. The tax cuts alone will account
for more than $7 trillion worth of additional debt
over the next 10 years. And no matter who had been
elected president in 2008, there was no magic wand
that would have averted the devastating impact of
the Great Recession, which simultaneously hammered
government tax revenues while requiring vast outlays
in automatic payments -- unemployment benefits, food
stamps, etc.
It's always fun to
try to imagine the counterfactual. What would John
McCain have done? Stood pat, and simply watched the
American economy hemorrhage half a million jobs a
month? Unthinkable. Cut spending on the social
safety net to balance the budget at a moment of
great national crisis? Equally ludicrous! Pass even
more tax cuts -- the standard GOP response to good
times and bad -- than Obama did? The deficit would
be even bigger!
Sure, any
president three years into his term gets blamed for
the status quo. But no U.S. president since
Franklin Roosevelt came into office facing a worse
economic situation, and it's interesting to wonder
how even FDR would have fared if he had been faced
with the task of pushing through legislation against
the will of today's Republican Party.
The Stimulus.
"Stimulus did
not create jobs. Stimulus has actually led to a
reduction in jobs."
LIE
Simply
asserting this does not make it so. The
Congressional Budget Office
says otherwise.
The private economic forecasting firm Macro Advisers
says otherwise.
So did
Moody's Investor Services.
And then there's the ever-popular (with Democrats)
chart of job loss and creation
since January 2008. The vast majority of job loss
attributable to the Great Recession occurred during
the last four months of Bush's administration and
the first five months of Obama's administration. But
over the course of the period during which stimulus
funding was actually distributed, the job numbers
steadily improved. Over the last year, the economy
has added more than a million jobs.
Job Creation.
"First of all,
we need to have the federal government stop
spending money ... Number 2 ... The United
States has one of the highest tax rates on doing
business in this country. We need to lower that
rate so the United States has a positive climate
to create jobs. Number 3: We have a 1.7 trillion
dollar burden on job creators in the form of
regulations. We need to go in and examine all
the regulations..."
LIE
Cut spending, cut
taxes, and cut regulations -- it's hard to imagine a
more boilerplate Republican platform.
1) Spending. We
may get the chance to find out sooner than we would
like what exactly happens when the federal
government stops spending money while the economy is
slowing, so maybe we should just wait and see the
result. But, briefly put, the evidence that
austerity might result in job growth in an economy
facing current U.S. conditions is
slim.
Actually, as
measured in terms of share of GDP, the U.S. has
the lowest corporate tax burden of any OECD
nation. While the official tax bracket may seem
high -- 35 percent -- if one takes into account
various loopholes and tax dodges, the
effective tax rate is considerably lower,
or around 27 percent, which comes in as slightly
higher than average for OECD members. And
according to ace tax reporter David Cay
Johnston, the bigger you are, the less you pay
-- the effective tax rate for the biggest U.S.
corporations is only about 15 percent.
3) $1.7 trillion
regulatory burden.
This number
comes from a study conducted by the "advocacy"
office of the Small Business Administration in 2008.
In April 2011, the Congressional Research Service
published
an extensive critique of the
calculations that
went into that number. The most glaring eye-opener?
"[The authors] said they did not provide estimates
of the benefits of regulations, even when the
information was readily available, because the SBA
Office of Advocacy did not ask them to do so. OMB's
reports to Congress have generally indicated that
regulatory benefits exceed costs."
So there you have
it: Michele Bachmann's economic platform. In the
final analysis, perhaps the most striking thing
about her proposals is how conventionally Republican
they are. There's not a whole lot of new thinking
here, aside from the admittedly radical notion that
the United States can get away with failing to raise
the debt limit. Other than that, it's a typical
mish-mash of misrepresentations and numbers that
don't add up.
After all of us had a bit of fun with
Michele Bachmann's gaffe on John Wayne
this week, I think it's
important to point out why even if she got confused over where
John Wayne was born and where serial killer John Wayne Gacy
carried out his serial murders, the issue that our corporate
media refused to address is the fact that she was praising John
Wayne as some role model that Republicans should be emulating in
the first place, and her saying "That's the kind of spirit that
I have, too" and completely ignoring how ridiculous propping
that man up as some bastion of conservatism is to begin with.
That is
if you want to actually look at how he actually lived his life
and not the myth that's been propagated in our media about him
and that Michele Bachmann apparently decided to embrace.
Salon's Glenn Greenwald
wrote a really excellent book back in 2008 which I bought and
thoroughly enjoyed reading shortly after it came out titled
Great American Hypocrites: Toppling the
Big Myths of Republican Politics.
If you want to read more, go buy it but I'm going to share a bit
of the preface here that explains in very clear terms why any
praise of John Wayne as we heard from Bachmann should be ripe
for mockery, but since it's our media that's been more than
happy to participate in continuing that myth about Wayne and
others that Greenwald addressed in his book, we're never going
to hear any of them talk about this. If we do I'll be pleasantly
surprised, but I'm not holding my breath.
Rough
transcript of some of Glenn's opening to his book:
For
the past three decades, American politics has been driven by
a bizarre anomaly. Polls continuously show that on almost
every issue, Americans vastly prefer the politics of the
Democratic Party to those of the Republican Party. Yet
during that time, the Republicans have won the majority of
elections. This book examines how and why that has happened.
The
most important factor, by far, is that the Republican Party
employs the same set of personality smears and mythical,
psychological, and cultural images to win elections. These
myths and smears are amplified by the right-wing noise
machine and mindlessly adopted by the establishment media.
Right-wing leaders are inflated into heroic cultural icons,
while Democrats are demonized as weak and hapless losers.
These personality-based myths overwhelm substantive
discussions and consideration of the issues.
Time and time again, Americans vote Republican due to their
perceptions that right-wing leaders exude such admirable
personality traits as courage, conviction, strength,
wholesome family morality, identification with the “regular
guy,” an affection for the military, fiscal restraint, and a
belief in the supremacy of the individual over the
government. Ronald Reagan, the wholesome “Everyman” rancher,
and George W. Bush, the swaggering, conquering cowboy rode
to victory on the basis of the cartoon imagery and marketing
themes that defined them.
[…]
The
sheer pervasiveness of this political deceit is somewhat
new, but the deceit itself goes back decades. As examined in
Chapter One, one of the earliest pioneers of this
manipulative right-wing marketing was John Wayne. Wayne was
a draft dodger during World War II, staying home in
Hollywood, getting rich by playacting as a war hero in one
film after the next while his acting peers were off fighting
in combat. Wayne then spent the rest of his life preening
around as a swaggering, uber-patriotic tough guy—cheering
for one war after another and viciously castigating war
opponents as cowards and subversives.
With the enormous gap between his self-righteous moralizing
rhetoric and the way he actually lived his life, John Wayne
proved himself to be one of the first right-wing Great
American Hypocrites. He tirelessly crusaded for wholesome
American morals and publicly condemned any perceived
deviations. Yet Wayne's personal life was a never-ending
carousel of adultery, divorces, new wives, shattered
families, pills, booze, and unrestrained hedonism.
Maybe
one of these days someone in our media will ask Bachmann why a
draft-dodging, fake war hero adulterer, divorcee, drunken, pill
popping hedonist like Wayne is someone she'd like to emulate,
but I'm not counting on that happening any time soon.
During an
appearance on ABC's
"Good Morning America" on Tuesday, Republican presidential candidate Michele
Bachmann was given an opportunity to set the record straight with regard to
comments she made
earlier this year lauding the nation's Founding Fathers for working
"tirelessly until slavery was no more in the United States.”
ABC's George Stephanopoulos asked the conservative
congresswoman to address the statement, noting that many of the
country's Founding Fathers, including Thomas Jefferson and George
Washington, in fact had slaves and that slavery wasn't abolished
until the Civil War. Here's an excerpt of the exchange that went
down:
Bachmann: Well you know what’s marvelous is that in this
country and under our constitution, we have the ability when we
recognize that something is wrong to change it. And that’s what we did
in our country. We changed it. We no longer have slavery. That’s a good
thing. And what our Constitution has done for our nation is to give us
the basis of freedom unparalleled in the rest of the world.
Stephanopoulos: I agree with that…
Bachmann: That’s what people want...they realize our
government is taking away our freedom.
Stephanopoulos: But that’s not what you said. You said
that the Founding Fathers worked tirelessly to end slavery.
Bachmann: Well if you look at one of our Founding
Fathers, John Quincy Adams, that’s absolutely true. He was a very young
boy when he was with his father serving essentially as his father’s
secretary. He tirelessly worked throughout his life to make sure that we
did in fact one day eradicate slavery...
Stephanopoulos: He wasn’t one of the Founding Fathers
– he was a president, he was a Secretary of State, he was a member of
Congress, you’re right he did work to end slavery decades later. But so
you are standing by this comment that the Founding Fathers worked
tirelessly to end slavery?
Asked if she stood by her assertion that the Founding
Fathers worked hard to end slavery given the facts, Bachmann said, "Well,
John Quincy Adams most certainly was a part of the Revolutionary War era. He
was a young boy but he was actively involved."
The remarks from the GOP hopeful come one day after she
formally announced
her candidacy for president of the United States in the key
primary state of Iowa.
Earlier this year, Bachmann
told a group of local
New Hampshire Republicans, "You're the state where the shot was heard around
the world in Lexington and Concord." However, the first shots of the
Revolutionary War were fired in Massachusetts, not the Granite State.
She
told CNN on Tuesday
morning, "I'm introducing myself now to the American people so
that they can know that I have a strong academic scholarly
background, more important I have a real life background."
In
an
appearance on Fox
News' "Hannity" on Monday night, Bachmann suggested that
President Barack Obama "is threatened by [her] candidacy." She
said, "He fears me. He sees me as a serious, substantive
competitor. I think he sees that I have a very clear path to
victory for the nomination. And, I think he wants to do whatever
he can to diminish me because he thinks he'll have to see me in
the debates. That's my intent, to take him on in the debates and
to win and take the voice of the people that I serve to the
White House."
Also on the program, Bachmann
accepted
an apology issued by
"Fox News Sunday" host Chris Wallace after
he asked her if she's
a "flake" on last weekend's edition of his show. Earlier in the
day, the Tea Party favorite
told ABC News'
Jonathan Karl, "I think that it's insulting to insinuate that a
candidate for president is less than serious. I'm a very serious
individual."
Below, a video clip of Bachmann's appearance on Fox News.
Over the weekend, Fox News' Chris Wallace asked Michele Bachmann if she was
a flake. Below is a compendium of some of her more outlandish remarks. Judge
for yourself.
June 27, 2011 |
The following article first appeared in Mother
Jones.
EDITOR'S NOTE: Over the weekend, Fox
News' Chris Wallace asked Michele
Bachmann if she was a flake. Below is a compendium of some of
her more outlandish remarks. Judge for yourself. Bachmann has
officially announced her candidacy for President.
Now in just her third term in Congress, Michele Bachmann, the
leader of the House tea party caucus, has earned a reputation as
one of the lower chamber's leading bomb-throwers, lobbing
overheated rhetoric at Democrats and needling establishment
Republicans. Her Minnesota colleague, Democratic Rep. Keith
Ellison once accused her of "psycho
talk"; in an interview with Politico,
a Pawlenty aide was just as blunt: "She's
a real pain in the ass." Former
state senator Dean Johnson, who was the Republican minority
leader during Bachmann's stint in St. Paul, has
said, "I don't think I ever
served with anybody who I mistrusted more, from either side of
the aisle."
Ouch. Bachmann also has a tendency to stretch the truth, or
simply sidestep it altogether. Bill Adair, editor of PolitiFact,
recently told Minnesota
Public Radio that he has never
researched a Bachmann quote and found it to be true (the only
major politician for which that's the case).
Here's an incomplete guide to Bachmann's greatest hits:
2001: In a letter she
co-wrote for the Minnesota-based Maple River Education
Coalition, Bachmann warns that President Bush's education
policies are leading the nation down the path to communism:
"Government is implementing policies that will lead to poverty,
not prosperity, by adopting the failed ideas of a state-planned
and managed economy similar to that of the former Soviet Union."
2003: Bachmann, then a state senator, explains why
she doesn't agree with the theory of evolution: "Where do we say
that a cell became a blade of grass, which became a starfish,
which became a cat, which became a donkey, which became a human
being? There’s a real lack of evidence from change from actual
species to a different type of species. That's where it's
difficult to prove." Don't even get her started on how a bill
becomes a law.
2003: Bachmann sends out a Christmas
Card advertising the
availability of her youngest son, Lucas: "Chick magnate [sic]
needs wife to put him through med school, clean house, pay bills
and run his life. Must be willing to gamble against onslaught of
socialized medicine diminishing return on investment."
2004: With the country locked in a heated
debate over gay marriage, Bachmann finds parallels in the Old
Testament: "We're in a state of crisis where our nation is
literally ripping apart at the seams right now, and lawlessness
is occurring from one ocean to the other. And we're seeing the
fulfillment of the Book of Judges here in our own time, where
every man doing that which is right in his own eyes—in other
words, anarchy."
2004: Songwriter Melissa Etheridge has breast cancer. That's bad
news. But there's good news too, Bachmann
tells the conservative
education group EdWatch: maybe the cancer will give her time to
reflect on her sinful lifestyle: "Unfortunately she is now
suffering from breast cancer, so keep her in your prayers. This
may be an opportunity for her now to be open to some spiritual
things, now that she is suffering with that physical disease.
She is a lesbian." In the same speech, she alleges that "almost
all, if not all, individuals who have gone into the lifestyle
have been abused at one time in their life, either by a male or
by a female."
2005: Bachmann explains her
opposition to the state's minimum wage as a form of job
creation: "Literally, if we took away the minimum wage—if
conceivably it was gone—we could potentially virtually wipe out
unemployment completely because we would be able to offer jobs
at whatever level."
2006: Campaigning for a seat in the House, Bachmann delivers a five-minute
prayer for You Can Run But You
Cannot Hide International, an anti-gay heavy metal ministry that
promotes the gospel to public school students: "I thank you for
how you are going to advance them from 260 schools a year, Lord,
to 2,600 schools a year. Lord, we ask by faith that you would
expand this ministry beyond anything the originators of this
ministry could begin to think or imagine."
2007: In an interview with the St. Cloud Times,
Bachmann drops
a bombshell: Iran is planning
on turning all of Northwest Iraq into a secret terrorist
training camp: "Iran is the troublemaker trying to tip over
apple carts all over Baghdad right now because they want America
to pull out. And you know why? It's because they've already
decided, that they're going to territory, they're- they're going
to partition Iraq and half of Iraq, the western northern portion
of Iraq is going to be called, the United, uh, the, the uh, -oh,
I'm sorry, I can't remember the actual name of it now, but it's
going to be called, um, uh, the, the, uh, uh the Iraq State of
Islam, something like that."
2008: Just two weeks before election day, Bachmann calls
for an investigation into the
anti-American ambitions of Barack Obama and congressional
Democrats: "What I would say is that the news media should do a
penetrating expose and take a look. I wish they would. I wish
the American media would take a great look at the views of the
people in Congress and find out if they are pro-America or
anti-America."
2008: Redundant Redundancies, vol.
I: "The big thing we are
working on now is the global warming hoax. It's all voodoo,
nonsense, hokum, a hoax."
2009: Explaining her
opposition to a bill that expands the scope of AmeriCorps, the
Peace Corps' domestic equivalent, Bachmann warned Minnesota's
KTLK that it could be the gateway to a mandatory brainwashing
program: "I believe that there is a very strong chance that we
will see that young people will be put into mandatory service.
And the real concerns is that there are provisions for what I
would call re-education camps for young people, where young
people have to go and get trained in a philosophy that the
government puts forward and then they have to go to work in some
of these politically correct forums."
2009: Picking up
on Sarah Palin's debunked warning abut "death panels" in the
Affordable Care Act, Bachmann declares:
"If you are a grandmother with Parkinson's or a child with
cerebral palsy, watch out."
2009: Bachmann
goes on Glenn Beck's Fox program to discuss the
specter of "One World currency" and delivers what historians may
later dub her "I am not a kook!" speech. "Glenn, I have
experienced that throughout my political career being labeled a
kook. It just happened again in a big story in the Minneapolis Star
Tribune. But all we have to do is point to the treasury
secretary on tape, on camera. This is not Michele Bachmann being
a kook. This is our treasury secretary on tape and on camera." A
visibly confused Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner had told
Bachmann he was not aware of any plan to replace the dollar.
2009: As the
nation (aided, perhaps, by Vice
President Joe Biden) freaks out
over Swine Flu, Bachmann implies—while
stressing that she isn't—that this whole thing might have been
Obama's doing: "I find it interesting that it was back in the
1970s that the swine flu broke out then under another Democrat
president, Jimmy Carter. And I'm not blaming this on President
Obama, I just think it's an interesting coincidence."
2009: Bachmann warns the
Affordable Care Act (a.k.a. health care reform) would include a
loophole permitting grade-schoolers to go on abortion field
trips: "Does that mean that someone's 13-year old daughter could
walk into a sex clinic, have a pregnancy test done, be taken
away to the local Planned Parenthood abortion clinic, have their
abortion, be back, and go home on the school bus that night? Mom
and dad are never the wiser. They don't know any different."
2009: Bachmann
frets that Democrats' cap-and-trade legislation, which proposed
using the powers of the free market to create carbon exchanges,posed
an existential threat to all
Americans: "I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous on
this issue of the energy tax because we need to fight back.
Thomas Jefferson told us 'having a revolution every now and then
is a good thing,' and the people—we the people—are going to have
to fight back hard if we're not going to lose our country. And I
think this has the potential of changing the dynamic of freedom
forever in the United States."
2009: With health
care reform coming ever closer to becoming a reality, Bachmann sounds the
Horn of Gondor: "What we have to do today is make a covenant, to
slit our wrists, be blood brothers on this thing. This will not
pass. We will do whatever it takes to make sure this doesn’t
pass."
2009: In an
interview on Fox
News, Bachmann warns that the
Obama administration could potentially use Census data to round
up Americans and put them in camps: "Between 1942 and 1947, the
data that was collected by the Census Bureau was handed over to
the FBI and other organizations at the request of President
Roosevelt, and that's how the Japanese were rounded up and put
into internment camps. I'm not saying that that's what the
administration is planning to do. But I am saying that private
personal information that was given to the Census Bureau in the
1940s was used against them to round them up in violation of
their constitutional rights."
2009: Bachmann
argues that abnormally large emissions of greenhouse gases like
carbon dioxide can't
be regulated because if we
did, birds would lose their natural habitat—air: "Life on planet
Earth can't even exist without carbon dioxide. So necessary is
it to human life, to animal life, to plant life, to the oceans,
to the vegetation that’s on the Earth, to the, to the fowl
that—that flies in the air, we need to have carbon dioxide as
part of the fundamental lifecycle of Earth."
2010: After former
President Bill Clinton tells reporters Bachmann's "armed and
dangerous" remarks could send the wrong message to fringe
groups, Bachmann accuses Clinton
of celebrating the Oklahoma City Bombings—by speaking at an
event honoring those who died in the attack. "He gave a speech,
and he called me out in his speech, and he was talking about the
anniversary—now, only Democrats would do this. The anniversary
of the Oklahoma City bombing by Tim McVeigh. I mean, we don’t
celebrate these things. This is not what we celebrate."
2010: Bachmann warns that
critics of the Affordable Care Act will be denied coverage,
based on their political beliefs. As evidence, she cites a
conversation with a Japanese man who told her that in Japan,
health care reform opponents are afraid to speak up: "'Well why
is that,' I asked. [He said], 'Because they know that would get
on a list and they wouldn’t get health care. They wouldn't get
in. They wouldn't get seen. And so people are afraid. They're
afraid to speak back to government. They're afraid to say
anything.' Is that what we want for our future? That takes us to
gangster government at that point!"
2010: After House
Democrats propose using a relatively standard parliamentary
procedures to pass the Affordable Care Act, Bachmann calls
for an investigation: "Well,
yeah, and the other thing is treason media. Where is the
mainstream media in all of this not telling this story? This is
a compelling story. That the Speaker of the House would even
consider having us pass a bill that no one votes on. That should
laugh her out of the House and there should be people that are
calling for impeachment off of something like this."
2010: Ever
vigilant of bureaucratic waste, Bachmann alleges that
President Obama's trip to India will be more expensive than the
entire war in Afghanistan: "The president of the United States
will be taking a trip over to India that is expected to cost the
taxpayers $200 million a day. He's taking 2,000 people with him.
He will be renting out over 870 rooms in India. And these are
five-star hotel rooms at the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel. This is the
kind of over-the-top spending." An exasperated White House
spokesman later said the charges, which stemmed from an
anonymous official in the west Indian state of Maharashtra, had
"no basis in reality."
2010: Remember
that whole bit about Obama being "anti-American" back in 2008? Yeah,
forget that. Bachmann tells
Bill O'Reilly: "Candidate Obama was a very reasonable fellow."
2010: Redundant
Redundancies, vol.
II [30] "That's what the Bill
of Rights is all about—to secure our individual liberties from
an overweening huge bureaucratic large big government."
2011: In a speech
to New Hampshire tea partiers, Bachmann crafts an
alternative history of the
American Revolution: "What I love about New Hampshire and what
we have in common is our extreme love for liberty. You’re the
state where the shot was heard around the world in Lexington and
Concord."
2011: As the
House GOP prepares to vote on a continuing resolution to fund
the government, Bachmann urges her colleagues to hold
the line: "This is our mice or
men moment. We need to show whether we are mice or men." The
bill passes; we're mice, apparently.
2011: Bachmann
suggests an
unlikely fix to the nation's
long-term deficit: "I think if we give Glenn Beck the numbers,
he can solve this."
2011: On Twitter,
Bachmann says the President's proposal to make
government-subsidized lunches more nutritional violates
the will of the Founders:
"Where in the #Constitution does it say the fed. government
should regulate potatoes in school lunches? It doesn't." Which
is true. Technically.
2011: In an
address to the group Iowans for Tax Relief, Bachmann praises the
Founding Fathers for their commitment to…diversity: "It didn't
matter the color of their skin, it didn't matter their language,
it didn't matter their economic status, it didn't matter whether
they descended from known royalty or whether they were of a
higher class or a lower class, it made no difference. Once you
got here [to the United States] you were all the same. Isn't
that remarkable?"
In the same interview, she praises the
Founders for working so hard to abolish slavery: "We know there
was slavery that was still tolerated when the nation began. We
know that was an evil and it was scourge and a blot and a stain
upon our history. But we also know that the very founders that
wrote those documents worked tirelessly until slavery was no
more in the United States."
2011: Seizing on
an administration directive to promote energy-efficient light
bulbs, Bachmann accuses the
administration of banning light bulbs altogether: "I think
Thomas Edison did a pretty patriotic thing for this country by
inventing the light bulb and I think darn well you New
Hampshirites, if you want to want to buy Thomas Edison's
wonderful invention you should be able to!"
2011: Michele Obama promotes breast-feeding as a means of reducing
child obesity. Bachmann senses more sinister
motives: "This is very consistent with
where the hard left is coming from. For them, government is the answer to
every problem. I've given birth to five babies and I breast fed every single
one of these babies. To think that government has to go out and buy my
breast pump for my babies? You wanna talk about the nanny state, I think you
just got a new definition."
FINANCIALS
She requested an extension of the May 15 filing
deadline
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) used Monday's New
Hampshire Republican debate to make a little news, announcing
that she had filed the paperwork to make her run for president
official.
Her intentions weren't exactly a mystery --
this was a presidential debate, after all -- but Bachmann
letting slip that she had filed the papers for her candidacy
earlier that day was the first official confirmation of her
intentions.
On Twitter, Bachmann's new presidential
account "TeamBachmann" blasted out the news shortly after the
debate announcement: "I'm in. RT if you'll join my campaign for
President of the United States:
http://www.michelebachmann.com#cnndebate."
Observers credited Bachmann with a strong
performance early on in the debate. She was particularly
animated on a question from a self-described "mainstream
Republican" running State Senate in New Hampshire on how
candidates would treat non-Tea Party GOP voters.
"What I've seen is, unlike how the media has
tried to wrongly and grossly portray the Tea Party, the Tea
Party is really made up of disaffected Democrats, independents.
... It's a wide swath of American coming together and I think
that's why the left fears it so much."
.....................................
Excerpts from huffingtonpost.com Speculatron,
June 24, 2011
So, Michele Bachmann's performance in the New
Hampshire GOP debate has gotten her candidacy off on the (far)
right foot. Her
favorability rating took a nice bounce,
as did her poll numbers. She's performing strong across the
board, and in at least one poll,
she emerged as the frontrunner.
All this and she has hasn't even officially kicked off her
campaign.
Next week, she'll hit the road,
visiting key states -- going
from Waterloo, Iowa to Raymond, N.H., to Myrtle Beach, S.C.
As always, woe betide anyone who underestimates her ability as a
fundraiser -- and she's only growing more popular lately.
And she's getting good reviews -- relative to Bachmann, anyway.
Things like, "She seems far
less crazy in person than she does on TV," and, "She does not
seem crazy."
Also,
she's been glitter-bombed. In short, she's having a moment.
And with that moment comes
her very own Matt Taibbi article, in which he refers to
Bachmann as "a religious zealot whose brain is a raging
electrical storm of divine visions and paranoid delusions."
The profile is the kind of battle-axing of
Bachmann that is going to do great pageviews for the
magazine but ultimately play right into her hand. It gives
Bachmann legitimate evidence that the fabled leftist
mainstream media is attacking her. Consequently, it will
make her more popular with a base that looks for which
conservative leader is being most reviled in the media, and
then assumes that person is their best bet. (It's not a
coincidence that Tim Pawlenty has completely avoided harsh
criticism from the MSM while at the same time being unable
to gain traction with Tea Party-influenced primary voters.)
Not only is the profile unnecessarily mean, it's sloppy.
Sloppy may be an understatement, actually! Taibbi
apparently borrowed pretty extensively from a piece from Minnesota's
City Pages, and
its author is not pleased with
the lack of citations or Rolling Stone's response -- somehow,
"space constraints" prevented adequate sourcing. (Links are promised for
the online version.)
Go read the whole thing to find out more
about what Abe's talking about, but it amounts to an unforced
journalistic error, upon which the Bachmann campaign may feast.
Chris Cillizza says that Bachmann has embarked on what he refers
to as a "silent
strategy," in that she's building "message discipline" and
striving to cut back on her "outspoken" ways. Which makes sense if you
just ignore the way she's lately contended that
Canada hasn't embarked on a stimulus
program (they have), that she didn't express her
anti-science views down at the Republican
Leadership Conference, and sort of accidentally
defended the principles of a single-payer
health care system (because she often doesn't know what she's
talking about.) She also decided to
publicly attack Mitt Romney for his stance
on abortion, so if this is a "silent strategy," it still
seems to feature a lot of amplified sounds coming out of her word-hole.
(What actually happened is that some "Bachmann adviser granted anonymity
to speak candidly about strategy" told Cillizza that they were pursuing
a "silent strategy," and Cillizza said, "Okay, awesome, let me just
scribble that down.")
Excerpts from articles on
huffingtonpost.com and crooksandliars.com by John Amato
June 16, 2011
I had to laugh after reading the Villagers
proclaim Michele Bachmann the winner of CNN's GOP debate in
NH simply because she was able to present herself as
somewhat normal. And as many others wrote, she stole the
spotlight because she announced on the podium that she was
indeed running for President. Wouldn't any normal person
viewing the debate have thought she was already running
since she was part of the debate?
Michele
Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann came
into Monday night’s presidential debate in the Queen
City as an unknown commodity. She left it as the most
talked-about candidate in the 2012 GOP field.
Bachmann stole headlines at the start
by announcing that she had filed to run for president —
skipping the exploratory phase entirely — and then
proceeding to command the stage in the first hour of the
CNN-sponsored debate with quotable answers on every
question asked of her. The crowd assembled at Saint
Anselm College broke into spontaneous applause after
several of Bachmann’s answers.
And others were impressed that
she has 23 foster children.
It's a good thing to be a foster parent, but if anybody in
the Beltway Media paid attention earlier, they would have
known that and probably reported on it when she started
making noises about jumping in the race. She is the head of
the
Tea Party Caucus in
Congress and yet this still seemed to come as a surprise.
What we heard from the media since the
debate is that she prepared well and had her answers down
pat, but what we haven't heard from the MSM is what her
views have been since she's been in office outside of
bashing Obama. They do know that she shares the same voters
that Sarah Palin does.
Bill O'Reilly was suggesting that she
would make a good VP pick for someone like Romney as he
talked to Dick Morris last night because members of the
House never get elected as President. Morris agreed with
that but only because he believes she hasn't been vetted yet
and there might be downside when the oppo research starts
while Romney has already been through that process. That's
the main reason Conservatives hate Romney.
The major reason Senators and members of
the House have problems running for the Oval Office is
because they take many, many votes in Congress which leaves
a record that their rivals use against them. President Obama
used Hillary Clinton's vote on the Iraq war as a big tool
against her since he never had to take that vote and could
later say he would have voted against it. It's Politics 101.
Bachmann honed her view of the world
after college, when she enrolled at the Coburn Law
School at Oral Roberts University, an
"interdenominational, Bible-based, and Holy Spirit-led"
school in Oklahoma. "My goal there was to learn the law
both from a professional but also from a biblical
worldview," she said in an April speech.
At Coburn, Bachmann studied with John
Eidsmoe, who she recently described as "one of the
professors who had a great influence on me."
Bachmann served as his research assistant on the 1987
book Christianity and the Constitution, which argued
that the United States was founded as a Christian
theocracy, and that it should become one again.
"The church and the state have separate spheres of
authority, but both derive authority from God," Eidsmoe
wrote. "In that sense America, like [Old
Testament] Israel, is a theocracy."
Eidsmoe, who hung up the phone when
asked for an interview, is a contentious figure.
Last year, he withdrew from speaking at a Wisconsin Tea
Party rally after the Associated Press raised questions
about his history of addresses to white supremacist
groups. In 2010, speaking a rally celebrating
Alabama's secession from the Union, he claimed that
Jefferson Davis and John C. Calhoun understood the
Constitution better than Abraham Lincoln.
Reading Eidsmoe, though, some of
Bachmann's most widely ridiculed statements begin to
make sense. Earlier this year, for example, she was
mocked for saying that the Founding Fathers "worked
tirelessly" to end slavery. But in books by
Eidsmoe and others who approach history from what they
call a Christian worldview, this is a truism.
Despite his defense of the Confederacy, Eidsmoe also
argues that even those founders who owned slaves opposed
the institution and wanted it to disappear, and that it
was only Christian for them to protect their slaves
until it did. "It might be very difficult for a
freed slave to make a living in that economy; under such
circumstances setting slaves free was both inhumane and
irresponsible," he wrote.
Bachmann is a cutting edge religious
right conservative, espousing an apocalyptic free market
fundamentalism that's become virtually indistinguishable
from the apocalyptic Randian worldview of the party's
libertarian wing. Bachmann spent months addressing
Tea Party rallies where she focused primarily on
economics.
What she's done like the rest of the
social conservatives these days is adopt Ayn Rand and Milton
Friedman's economic theological principles and incorporated
them into their many forms of Evangelical Christianity and
that will help her in the GOP primary.
Here's a few of her greatest hits since
the news media apparently needs me to do some research for
them.
Bachmann has said Dems didn't want her to
be the first woman President so she was criticized, but here
are a few more insane
rants for your viewing pleasure:
But, Bachmann's Latest Conspiracy Theory is a Doozy
Rep.
Michele Bachmann's (R-Minn.) creativity is unrivaled
in contemporary politics. Consider
her remarks yesterday to a gathering of the
Republican Leadership Conference.
Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, the
latest candidate to join the Republican presidential
campaign, suggested Friday that President Obama
secretly wanted Medicare to go bankrupt so retirees
would be forced to enroll in the new national health
care law.
"This hasn't been
talked about very much -- the president's plan
for senior citizens is Obamacare," Ms. Bachmann
told party activists here. She added, "I think
very likely what the president intends is that
Medicare will go broke and ultimately that
answer will be Obamacare for senior citizens."
Bachmann's principal problem is that she combines
the worst of two important traits: she's strikingly
ignorant about public policy and she's
paranoid to the point of delusion.
It's these qualities that lead Bachmann to come up
with such odd theories. In this case, the unhinged
Minnesotan believes President Obama is secretly
trying to eliminate Medicare, forcing seniors into
the Affordable Care Act. Is there any evidence at
all to support this? Of course not, but that's not
important right now.
In practical terms, Bachmann apparently thinks the
president is secretly right-wing -- she
believes Obama wants to end the existing
system of socialized medicine for seniors, and force
these millions of seniors into the private insurance
market.
Of course, there is a group of people who actually
support such an approach. They're called "House
Republicans." Indeed, the House GOP budget plan --
written by Paul Ryan and endorsed by none other than
Michele Bachmann -- seeks to end Medicare and
convert the program into an ACA-style system.
Bachmann's conspiracy theory is that Obama secretly agrees
with her far-right colleagues.
This isn't just wrong; it's
mad-as-a-hatter crazy.
Bachmann's ability to come up with
remarkable conspiracy theories has always impressed
me. Remember the time the right-wing presidential
candidate argued that the U.S. Census may lead to "internment
camps"? How about when she warned of a "one-world
currency" because she got confused about what a
global reserve currency is? Or maybe the time she
thought the "Lion King" was secretly
gay propaganda? How about the time she said a
bipartisan national service bill could lead to "re-education
camps"?
This new one, though, is probably my
favorite to date. Anytime a right-wing lawmaker
talks to a right-wing audience and thinks it's wise
to attack President Obama as secretly on their
side, it deserves some kind of award.
{ Matthew 19:16, 21-26 } When
someone came to Jesus with the crucial question:
"Good Master, what must I do to have eternal
life and happiness? [
Jesus told him that he must begin by obeying the ten
commandments. But, then he said...]
"If you want to be perfect, go and sell
everything you have and give the money to the poor, and you will have
treasure in heaven; and come, follow me." But when the young man heard
this, he went away sadly, for he was very rich.
Without walking away, most "Christians" just tune out
this teaching of Jesus these days, and pretend to follow Christ
without really doing so.
. . . Then Jesus said to his disciples,
"It is almost impossible for a rich man to get
into the Kingdom of Heaven. I say it again – it is easier for a
camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the
Kingdom of God!" When the disciples heard
this, they were greatly astounded and said, "Then who can be saved?"
And Jesus replied, "For mortals it is
impossible, but for God all things are possible."
2) You cannot be both
rich and a follower of Christ :
{ Luke 16:13-15}
" No slave can serve two masters; for a slave
will either hate the one and love the other, or be devoted to the one and
despise the other. You cannot serve God and wealth." The
Pharisees, who were lovers of money, heard all this, and they ridiculed him.
So he said to them, "You are those who justify
yourselves in the sight of others; but God knows your hearts; for what is
prized by human beings is an abomination in the sight of God."
{Luke 12:15-21} And he said to them,
"Take care! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; for
one's life does not consist in the abundance of possessions."
Then he told them a parable:
"The land of a rich man produced abundantly. And
he thought to himself, 'What should I do, for I have no place to store
my crops?' Then he said, 'I will do this: I will pull down
my barns and build larger ones, and there I will store all my grain and my
goods. And I will say to my soul, 'Soul, you have ample goods
laid up for many year; relax, eat, drink, be merry.' But
God said to him, 'You fool! This very night your life is being
demanded of you. And the things you have prepared, whose will they
be?' So it is with those who store up treasures for themselves but are
not rich toward God." "Yes, every man is a fool who gets rich on earth
but not in heaven. Sell what you have and give to those in need.
This will fatten your purses in heaven! And the purses of heaven
have no rips or holes in them. Your treasures there will never
disappear; no thief can steal them; no moth can destroy them. Wherever
your treasure is, there your heart and thoughts will also be."
Many so-called "Christian" preachers teach that Jesus (
or God) has no problem with people being rich. But the
following is still another powerful illustration Jesus used
to show how much God disapproves of this world's
wealth being hoarded into huge piles by greedy and/or clever
individuals :
{ Luke 16:20-31: } "One day
Lazarus, a diseased beggar, was laid at the door of a rich
man's house. As he lay there longing for scraps
from the rich man's table, the dogs would come and lick his
open sores. Finally the beggar died and was
carried by the angels to be with Abraham in the place of the
righteous dead.
"The rich man also died and was
buried, and his soul went into hell. There, in torment, he saw
Lazarus in the far distance with Abraham. 'Father Abraham,' he
shouted, 'have some pity! Send Lazarus over here if only to dip the tip of
his finger in water and cool my tongue, for I am in anguish in these
flames.' But Abraham said to him, 'Son, remember that during your
life-time you had everything you wanted, and Lazarus had nothing. So
now he is here being comforted and you are in anguish."
What if God cares enough about the whole world to hold
us "Christians" in America with infinitely more wealth than millions of
people in other parts of the world responsible for doing our best to
ignore those unlucky enough to have been born on the "other side of the
tracks", in the many desperately poor communities of this world ? Is
this parable relevant only to rich vs. poor individuals?
Or does it relate to rich Christian nations vs. the many extremely
poor nations of this world?
. . . "And besides, there is a great chasm
separating us, and anyone wanting to come to you from here is stopped at
its edge; and no one over there can cross to us.'
Then the rich man said,
'O Father Abraham, then please send him to my father's
home – for I have five brothers – to warn them about this place of torment,
lest they come here when they die.' But Abraham said, 'The
Scriptures have warned them again and again. Your brothers can read
them any time they want to.' The rich man replied, 'No, Father
Abraham, they won't bother to read them. But if someone is sent to
them from the dead, then they will turn from their sins.' But Abraham
said, 'If they won't listen to Moses and the prophets, they won't
listen even though someone rises from the dead.'
How many so-called Christian preachers do you know who
are challenging America's high-living Christian conservatives, as this web
site is trying to do, to live by those scriptures ?
Unless and until they do, don't wonder why the vast majority of people who
imagine themselves to be "Christians" do not identify with the down-and-out,
such as :
children deprived of their mothers, because
society thinks it's a good idea to put these young women in prisons (and
then looks the other way when these mothers are raped by their "guards"
in our prisons).
schools going from bad to worse in urban
areas, as more prosperous "Christians" flee to the suburbs and take all
their tax contributions with them.
African Americans and Native Americans
continuing to suffer from the atrocities perpetrated on their ancestors
by our ancestors over the course of centuries.
Working class people who are threatened or
punished for trying to organize themselves into unions.
poor helpless men, women and children being
forced to work for slave wages all over the world, while Americans can
afford to pay outrageous sums to make middlemen like the Walton family
of Wal-Mart the richest people in America.
Taxes are cut – not for those with the
greatest need for tax relief – but for those with the least
need for it, even over the objections of some of America's wealthiest
tax payers!
many people having no peace of mind when it
comes to their health or financial security, because they can't get any
health insurance.
older Americans whose health insurance
doesn't cover the one service they now need most, i.e.
prescription drug coverage.
poor people right here in America, who
can't afford the cost of even the poorest of housing, even if they work
full time, because the minimum wage allowed in this country has been
kept so disgracefully low, while the cost of housing has risen
astronomically.
blacks and browns being imprisoned at twice
the rate of whites, despite the fact that there are four times as many
whites and they commit more crimes.
poor people are thrown in prison for petty
crimes, but rich people are allowed to keep the loot they steal
in "white collar" crimes, IF they get caught, after paying small fines
or serving a token amount of time in country club prisons.
{ John, 3: 16 – 18 } "We know love by this, that he laid
down his life for us – and we ought to lay down our lives for one another.
How does God's love abide in anyone who has the world's goods and sees a
brother or sister in need and yet refuses help? Little children, let
us love, not in word or speech, but in truth and action."
Instead of being concerned about such issues, and
supporting those who need our help, many so-called
"Christian" preachers promote the idea that God is a kind of
golden goose, whose job it is to constantly bless us
rather than to move us to "bless" others, by sharing our
extraordinary wealth in this world with those who don't have
enough to live on. Such preachers and leaders have
driven to the very top of the NY Times' Best Seller List a
book promising earthly blessings to
those who read the book and pray "The Prayer of Jabez".
Ayn Rand was an Atheist - but Republican
Politicians have chosen her as a Roll Model. Why? Because she looks at
the Rich as Producers and the Poor and Middle Class as Parasites! Does
The Tea Party Really Know what Ayn Rand's Philosophy Really Was?
Excerpts from an article in
rollcall.com by Susie Madrak Jun 21, 2011
Bachmann was
playing with House money
and the media organizations that saw Rep. Weiner punished for his sins should
jump right on this.
On Nov. 5, 2009, at the behest of Rep.
Michele Bachmann, thousands of tea party activists
descended on the Capitol to vent their rage over the
health care overhaul bill pending before Congress.
The assembled activists chanted, "Kill
the bill! Kill the bill!" and waved signs opposing a
government takeover of health care — but they may not
have known that the same government was paying for the
event.
According to House expense reports,
Bachmann and three conservative GOP colleagues — Reps.
Tom Price (Ga.), Steve King (Iowa) and Todd Akin (Mo.) —
each paid $3,407.50 that day, a total of $13,630, to a
sound and stage company called National Events,
apparently for the sound system used at the rally.
The money came from the Members'
taxpayer-funded office accounts, despite House rules
prohibiting the use of these funds for political
activities. Bachmann's office insists the expense was a
proper use of official funds.
Bachmann billed the event as a "press
conference," which can be funded from official accounts.
But no questions were taken from the press and, unlike
most press conferences, it opened with a prayer, the
national anthem and a recitation of the Pledge of
Allegiance.
A few days earlier, the Minnesota
Republican had appeared on a Fox News talk show and made
an appeal for activists to come to D.C. for the event,
promising to help them lobby Congress against the bill.
Dynion Mwyn National Politics Editor:
The Lame Stream Media has blinders on when its
Republican FINANCIAL scandals. If there were photos of Michele giving Tom
Price a blow job, they might be interested. But maybe not, Tom Price would
have to give Todd Akin a Blow job. There has to be a Penis involved before
the media wakes up from their normal stupor.
"Louisiana students can't
compete with kids across the country and around the world if we're
not being taught evolution," said Zack Kopplin, 17.
Excerpts from an article posted on
alternet.org May 28, 2011 |
Most high school students are concerned about
their grades or getting into a good college, but 17-year-old Zack
Kopplin is focusing on conducting a national campaign to challenge a
congresswoman on her basic understanding of the separation of church
and state.
Kopplin, a student
from Baton Rouge Magnet High School, is working tirelessly to repeal
the Louisiana Science Education Act (LSEA), a piece of legislation
that Kopplin said is a way to
sneak the teaching of creationism
into Louisiana public school science classrooms.
Initially presented
under the guise of "academic freedom," LSEA singles out
evolution for specific criticism.
The bill allows local school boards to approve supplemental
classroom materials specifically for the critique of scientific
theories.
The text of the bill suggests that this is all
designed to aid critical thinking, and calls on the Board of
Education to "assist teachers, principals, and other school
administrators to create and foster an environment within public
elementary and secondary schools that promotes critical thinking
skills, logical analysis, and open and objective discussion of
scientific theories."
And what are the areas in need of "critical
thinking," you ask? Coincidentally, the hot button issues the
Religious Right have turned into legislative crusades: evolution,
the origins of life, global warming, and human cloning.
Kopplin is horrified his state has adopted the
pro-creationism law. "It is embarrassing," he said, "The
New York Times covered this law, and I have friends and
family around the country who called me up and asked me about it. No
one should be embarrassed by their state."
Beyond the personal humiliation of living in a
state that teaches a fairytale about a sky daddy alongside real
things like carbon dating, genome-mapping and gravity, Kopplin fears
for the future of Louisiana's educational system.
"This hurts Louisiana students' chances of getting
the good science-based jobs we want. Research centers, like Baton
Rouge's Pennington Center, are not going to hire Louisiana kids
because they won't know whether we were taught the science we need
to work there," he said, adding that in a world constantly making
rapid advancements in scientific understanding, Louisiana can't
afford to backslide into the dark ages.
"Louisiana students can't compete with kids across
the country and around the world if we're not being taught
evolution," Kopplln said.
Such anti-science
behavior is even bad for tourism, according to Kopplin. "The Society
for Integrative and Comparative Biology
pulled a prescheduled convention
from New Orleans after the law passed, and other groups have made it
clear that they don't plan to come back while the law is in place."
Kopplin supported a
bill designed to
repeal LSEA,
which also shared the backing of more than 40 Nobel science
laureates, national science organizations, university professors,
high school biology teachers, the Louisiana Association of
Educators, and a petition with more than 60,000 signatures.
Despite the overwhelming pressure from the
scientific community (not a single state or national science
organization lobbied on behalf of LSEA), Sen. Karen Carter
Peterson's Senate Bill 70 died in committee Thursday. Kopplin blames
the repeal's demise on the oppositional pressure coming from the
Louisiana Family Forum, an affiliate of Focus on the Family and a
powerful lobbying group.
LFF enjoyed another
victory this month when it successfully urged the Louisiana
legislature to kill House Bill 112, also known as the Safe Schools
Bill, which sought to better protect school children from bullying.
LFF's executive director, Gene Mills, referred to the piece of
legislation as the "Homosexual
Bullying Bill."
"We're selective in
when we want to listen to experts. When we're talking about the
economy we bring in economists. When we're talking about roads and
bridges we bring in engineers. Why don't we afford the same to
science? How do you ignore 42 Nobel laureates?" Peterson
asked the committee.
"It is fundamentally embarrassing to have this law on the books."
"Creationism is not
science,"
said Kopplin.
"It does not belong in a public school science classroom. Put it in
a religion class, a philosophy class, but not in a science class."
Kopplin is not impressed by the "critical
thinking" claims made in LSEA. "They don't need a law to teach
critical thinking in a science class," Kopplin said. "Science is
critical thinking."
Furthermore, he doesn't plan to limit the scope of
this fight to Louisiana. Earlier this week, the high schooler called
out Minnesota's Michele Bachmann for trying to pass SF 1714, a bill
similar to LSEA, that would require public schools to permit the
teaching of intelligent design creationism in the school science
curriculum.
Perhaps such
ignorance should be expected from the woman who stood on the House
floor and declared that the threat of manmade global warming doesn't
make sense because "carbon
dioxide is a natural byproduct of nature."
"Bachmann's ongoing misrepresentation of science
and scientists at a national level adds fuel and false authority to
the lobbyists and politicians in my state who have an agenda to
undermine evidence-based science," he said.
No doubt, Zack Kopplin's resolute stance will not
be shaken by this recent defeat. "Even if we don't get it this year,
we've laid a remarkable foundation for next year. We can get 100
Nobel Laureates for next year and thousands more signatures and
phone calls and kids involved," he said before the vote. Now
read the next article!!
The below contains excerpts from an article
posted on huffingtonpost.com by Michael Zimmerman on
05/31/11
Michele Bachmann, as virtually everyone
knows, is currently deciding whether she's going to make a
run for the Tea Party, oops, I meant to say, Republican,
nomination for president. What most don't know, though, is
that her educational policies are being challenged by an
amazing high school student from Baton Rouge, La. You should
get to know this student, Zack Kopplin, and his efforts
because he's likely to make a difference.
I've written about Zack previously because
both his story and his commitment are incredibly impressive.
As I first
noted, he recently began an
effort to repeal an atrocious stealth-creationism law in
Louisiana. The law, the Louisiana Science Education
Act of 2008, encourages attacks on evolution to be taught in
Louisiana's public schools under the banner of critical
thinking. This is the only state law of its sort in
the country and, as Zack so well points out, Louisiana
students interested in science are being done a huge
disservice by its very existence.
Zack's work didn't stop there. He wrote a
petition that was adopted
as Change.org's featured one of the week where it has
amassed more than 65,000 supporters. And, as I
reported in April, in his
most extraordinary effort, he collected the endorsement of
43 individuals who won
a Nobel Prize in science.
Which brings me back to Michele Bachmann.
Not only is Bachmann a fan of creationism and its
anti-intellectual offshoot, intelligent design, she's made
some outlandish claims about the pseudoscientific subject.
For example, she's asserted, "there is a controversy among
scientists about whether evolution is a fact ... hundreds
and hundreds of scientists, many of them holding Nobel
prizes, believe in intelligent design."
Zack has now challenged Bachmann on her
claims. Using a poker analogy and the huge number of
scientists who have endorsed evolution, in general, and his
repeal effort, in particular, Zack has
written, "Congresswoman
Bachmann, I see your 'hundreds' of scientists, and raise you
millions of scientists."
Given the strength of the hand he has, he
doesn't stop there.
For the next hand, I raise you 43 Nobel
Laureate scientists. That's right: 43 Nobel Laureate
scientists have endorsed our effort to repeal
Louisiana's creationism law. ... Congresswoman Bachmann,
you claim that Nobel Laureates support creationism. Show
me your hand. If you want to be taken seriously by
voters while you run for President, back up your claims
with facts. Can you match 43 Nobel Laureates, or do you
fold?
It would be difficult for someone with a
sincere interest in science education not to take Zack
Kopplin's challenge seriously. Having said that, I fully
expect that Michele Bachmann will completely ignore Zack,
the voice of the scientific community, the combined pleas of
43 Nobel scientists and thousands of religious leaders.
All of this reminds me of a Sunday
afternoon a couple of years ago when I was in Lambeau Field
with my two sons watching the Packers play the Bears. After
a controversial and costly penalty was called against the
Packers, the referee began to give a convoluted explanation
of his ruling. The entire crowd of 73,000 plus was
completely silent while the odd explanation was being
delivered over the PA system. Then, all of a sudden, one fan
with a booming voice that could be heard throughout the
entire stadium shouted,
"Stop Making Shit Up!"
Representative Bachmann, I
urge you to pay attention to that fan.
It has been determined that
Michele Bachmann is going to be consigned to Dantes Hell because
Michele Bachmann is Damned! That much is clear. But where
and how? Dante neglected to specify which circle of hell a soul is
consigned to after betraying the Nations Healthcare of the Poor and
Children for the sake of politics.
Traitors are of course
consigned to the innermost circles, ranging from traitors to their kin,
lords, country and benefactors. No space appears to have been left
for traitors to the Poor and children.
The thought struck us that
hell is long overdue for a make-over. The business of sin has
changed substantially since Dante's day. Not only are many of the
sins archaic (it seems doubtful at this point that Protestants are
damned as schismatics) but as in the Bachmann case, Dante has failed to
keep up with the times. What is the punishment for TV evangelists
Political Liars, Political Thieves, or for that matter for Congresswomen
who vote to take away healthcare for children who need it and lie about
attacking defenseless children and "being put on a list" to make a
point.
Whatever Bachmann's concern
about gathering hard evidence to bolster her position to vote against
healthcare, anyone who betrays This Nations Children in that calculating
manner deserves the fate that Dante would assign her: being
trapped in ice up to the neck in the deepest pit of the Inferno, where
treachery against basic human bonds is punished and where Satan himself,
once the brightest of the rebel angels, beats his bat's wings.
Good Luck Michele, Satan is
coming for you anytime now - he remembers when you sold your soul and
he's coming to collect!!!
Michele
Bachmann Lies To Iowa Voters About Her Family Roots. SHAME!!!
She has Helped Spawn An Entire Genre of Christian Nationalist
Pseudo-History
Excerpts from an article posted
April 9, 2011 on alternet.org by B.E. Wilson
“Those who control the present,
control the past and those who control the past control the future.”
– George Orwell, 1984
Politicians lie all the time, this
we know. But what’s addressed here is different–a determined ongoing
campaign to overwrite the historical record with carefully crafted
history lies designed to steer America away from democratic, secular
pluralism and towards Christian supremacy.
Would Michele Bachmann lie about
her family genealogy to seem more “Iowan”, presumably to impress
state residents who might attend the upcoming February 2012 Iowa
caucus, that will help establish front-runners, in both major
political parties, in the 2012 presidential race?
But this isn’t surprising
given that, as Rodda describes, back in 1987 Michele Bachmann worked
as a research assistant for one of the seminal books in the growing
genre of Christian nationalist falsified American history works
packed with history lies that are seeping into
JROTC curriculum,
PBS
documentaries,
the
National Prayer Breakfast,
and political discourse within the Republican Party [If
you want to understand more about the impact of these books, see
Frederick Clarskon's
History is Powerful - Why the Christian Right
Distorts History and Why it Matters.]
Many of the current Republican front
runners expected to seek their party’s nomination to run for president
in 2012, notably Mike Huckabee, Michele Bachmann, and Newt Gingrich, are
aggressively courting David Barton, the reigning crown prince of this
oeuvre of pseudo-history that’s chock full of distortions, myths,
and outright lies which serve to advance the claim that America was
originally founded as a Christian nation rather than as a secular
republic.
In 2010 Fox talk show host Glenn
Beck rolled out an ongoing weekly series featuring David Barton’s
history lies, which prompted Chris Rodda to kickoff an ongoing series of
posts
debunking the lies
that Beck was broadcasting out to millions of credulous viewers.
Mike Huckabee, recently
grilled about his praise for Barton’s work
by Jon Stewart on the Daily Show, feels so strongly about it that at a
recent Christian supremacist conference former Arkansas governor
Huckabee joked that he
wishes every American could be forcibly
indoctrinated
with Barton’s teachings – indoctrinated at gunpoint if necessary. Strong
words for a man aspiring to the presidency of the United States,
especially in light of the growing power of the position, which some
observers characterize as the “imperial presidency.”
Michele Bachmann and other
leading Republican presidential hopefuls have stood onstage with and
lavished praise on Barton, who
seems to endorse “Biblical slavery”
and whose organization’s website favorably quotes
radical-Free Market theologian
R.J. Rushdoony, a racist Holocaust revisionist known for his
denunciation of miscegenation (race-mixing, that is)
Does David Barton endorse the ideas of
R.J. Rushdoony? Do any of the current Republican presidential hopefuls?
They would no doubt deny it, because Rushdoony’s ideas were (and are)
wildly controversial and highly offensive to most Americans.
In a
January 2008 Talk To Action story,
while he was governor of Arkansas Mike Huckabee employed a prominent
Christian Reconstructionist as a policy adviser. That’s not the only
data point. In an April 12, 2010 Religion Dispatches
post, RD editor
Sarah Posner covered Huckabee’s numerous links to Christian
Reconstructionists and their movement, ties also noted by observers
across the political spectrum from
Joe Conason of
Salon.com to
Robert Novak of
the Washington Post.
Christian Reconstructionism
usually gets noticed for its more atavistic aspects, such as the
advocacy by some leading Reconstructionists (including R.J. Rushdoony)
of
“Biblical stoning”
(or burning at the stake) as capital punishments for astrology and
witchcraft, idolatry, blasphemy, adultery, “sodomy or homosexuality”,
un-chastity before marriage (by women), apostasy (renunciation of the
faith), and “incorrigible juvenile delinquency”.
As Walter Olson wrote in a
delightfully sardonic and quite informative 1998 article published in
Reason magazine,
Invitation To A Stoning,
Reconstructionists provide the
most enthusiastic constituency for stoning since the Taliban seized
Kabul. “Why stoning?” asks [Gary] North. “There are many reasons.
First, the implements of execution are available to everyone at
virtually no cost.” Thrift and ubiquity aside, “executions are
community projects–not with spectators who watch a professional
executioner do `his’ duty, but rather with actual participants.” You
might even say that like square dances or quilting bees, they
represent the kind of hands-on neighborliness so often missed in
this impersonal era.
You can watch David Barton
expressing Biblical capitalism ideas in this video, compiled by Kyle
Mantyla of People For The American Way’s
Rightwing
Watch, in
which Barton makes the claim that Biblical scripture prohibits a capital
gains tax.
Meanwhile, back to Michele Bachmann–a
veritable grande dame of the falsified history movement, it would
seem. As Chris Rodda explains,
In her speech at the March 24
and 25 Rediscover God in America conference in Iowa, Michelle
Bachmann, like the other potential 2012 Republican presidential
candidates who spoke at this conference, lavished praise on their
fellow speaker, Christian nationalist pseudo-historian David Barton.
Bachmann also revealed that her involvement in the history
revisionism game goes back even further than her association with
Barton. As a student at Oral Roberts University, she met John
Eidsmoe, and worked as a research assistant on his 1987 book,
Christianity and the Constitution. Eidsmoe is another Christian
nationalist history revisionist, whose Christianity and the
Constitution book predates the first edition of Barton’s book The
Myth of Separation by a year. In fact, some of Barton’s lies are
adaptations of Eidsmoe’s lies and half-truths, a number of which are
debunked in my book. But I had no idea that Bachmann had been
involved with Eidsmoe or his book until she talked about it at the
Rediscover God in America conference, or that it was Eidsmoe who
introduced her to Barton’s material…. But Bachmann’s admiration of
history revisionists wasn’t the thing that really caught my
attention in her speech at the conference…
Rodda goes on to provide a detailed
debunking of
Michele Bachmann’s self-described “Iwegian” (Iowan Norwegian) roots. As
Rodda concludes, back in 2008 when it was more politically advantageous
to do so, Bachmann stressed her Minnesota family roots which, now it
would seem, aren’t as desirable for the presidential hopeful, who now
has morphed into an “Iwegian”:
during her 2008 campaign for
reelection in Minnesota, when it was more advantageous for her to be
a Minnesotan, her campaign website emphasized her Minnesota roots
with a section on its “About” page titled “Rooted in Minnesota,”
which began, “Michele grew up in Anoka.”
If Bachmann’s presidential
aspirations don’t work out and she has settle for running for
reelection to Congress, I wonder how her constituents in Minnesota
will feel about her denouncing her Minnesota roots in favor of being
an Iowan.
Back in August of 2009, Michele
Bachmann said that she wouldn't run for president unless
she received instructions from the Lord Almighty
to do so. Well, apparently, God is all,
"Feh, I was thinking of wrapping this whole universe I created up really
soon, so, whatever, Michele, go for it." And so now
we get the news this week
that Bachmann will maybe form an exploratory committee in June, or even
earlier, or maybe never, who knows?
Regardless, she's "in for
the conversation":
"I'm in for 2012 in that I want
to be a part of the conversation in making sure that President Obama
only serves one term, not two, because I want to make sure that we
get someone who's going to be making the country work again. That's
what I'm in for," Bachmann said.
"But I haven't made a
decision yet to announce, obviously, if I'm a candidate or not, but
I'm in for the conversation."
In New Hampshire,
the news was greeted with mixed reviews,
with some saying it's unwise to get "too excited about these candidacies
when in fact that these people don't have a whole lot of experience to
be the leader of the free world," and other people saying that Bachmann
"stands up for her principles and has not wavered on her positions at
all." Michele Bachmann will not waver from her position that Lexington,
Massachusetts is actually in New Hampshire, which is probably good news
for New Hampshire.
Bachmann might join fellow Minnesotan Tim Pawlenty in the
presidential race, which Minnesota Republican Party chairman Tony Sutton
calls "an
embarrassment of riches." From
Pawlenty's perspective, this is actually not great news: Pawlenty is on
a mission to garner more attention for his candidacy, but the media's
kliegs tend to love them some Bachmann. (The first thing Bachmann did
after floating the possibility that she might form an exploratory
committee was
hire a prominent Iowa Birther,
so you can see where this is going.)
Apparently, Michele Bachmann is
now confirming that she has received the long-awaited go-ahead from the
Lord on her presidential run.
Per Eric Kleefeld,
she revealed that she had received His blessing in an interview with
Iowa Public Television:
Henderson:
You recently referenced your
Christian faith. Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, when he
announced he would not run, said that he just didn't feel called to
do that. Have you had that sort of calling to run for president?
Bachmann:
Well, every decision that I make
I pray about as does my husband and I can tell you, yes, I've had
that calling and that tugging on my heart that this is the right
thing to do and because it's such a momentous decision, not only for
myself, my husband and our 28 children, it is a momentous decision.
You can watch the entire interview, here.
And let's just remember that God created the platypus and "works in
mysterious ways" before we all go changing religions, okay?
While Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN)
has emerged as a darling of the Tea Party and conservative wing of the
Republican party, she has largely avoided the kind of close scrutiny of
her record that is a hallmark of a presidential campaign. Even before
she officially launches her bid,
Matt Lewis
observes that "the Tea Party rhetoric doesn't always match the record...
Bachmann would likely find herself defending a slew of questionable
votes and decisions, including on earmarks, pardons and farm subsidies."
"The federalist argument is also severely undercut by the fact that
since joining the U.S. Congress in 2007, Bachmann has appropriated more
than $3.7 million in earmarks. What is more, when Republicans sought an
earmark moratorium, Bachmann pushed to exclude transportation projects
from the ban. Bachmann may also be plagued by her involvement in a
controversial pardon. In 2007, Bachmann wrote a letter requesting a
presidential pardon for a convicted drug-smuggler and money-launderer
named Frank Vennes... Making matters worse, he and his wife donated a
total of $27,600 to Bachmann's 2006 and 2008 election."
MINNEAPOLIS (The
Borowitz Report) – Making a joint
appearance at a Tea Party rally in Minneapolis, former Alaska Gov.
Sarah Palin and Rep. Michele Bachmann put out a cryptic call for
“two more horsemen” to join their movement. They are obsessed
with becoming The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse from the Bible.
“Michele and me, that’s two
horsemen right there,” Gov. Palin told the exuberant crowd.
“You add two more horsemen into the mix and we’ll be good to go.”
While the two politicians were
cagey about what the duties of the aforementioned horsemen would be,
Rep. Bachmann said, “You can bet it will be a mission to end all
missions.”
According to a source close to the
two politicians, they have already drawn up a list of possible
candidates for the additional two horsemen, a list which includes
Rush Limbaugh,Glenn Beck,
Ann Coulter, and the entire
Cheney family.
“It’s a long list,” the source
said. “If you add up everyone on the list the number you get
is 666.”
The Tea Party rally
featuring Palin and Bachmann received wide coverage, including
mention in the collected works of Nostradamus and in the prophecies
of ancient Mayans.
More here.
Oh, Michele. I take it you really,
really didn't read that bill before you voted against it did you?
Minnesota voters, how does that make you feel, knowing that your
elected representative couldn't be bothered to read something before
voting against it?
Michele's solutions are either in
the bill already or are just restatements of the same old arguments with
different words. After explaining just how difficult it will be to
repeal health care reform, she then enumerates how the country can best
cover the "thirty-thousand uninsured". Here is her list:
Sell across state lines
-
That's already in the bill in the
form of regional co-ops that can form with regulatory approval by
all involved states.
What ISN'T in the bill:
Basing operations in a US territory or state with very little in the
way of insurance regulation and selling into states that are heavily
regulated.
If Bachmann had her way, insurers would
move their base of operations to the
Cayman Islands and insure only those who made more than
$250,000/year.
The rest of us could be screwed, but hey, at least
we could buy insurance across state lines!
Make insurance 100% deductible
-
This is in the bill, too.
Of course, for those receiving subsidies, the insurance is not 100%
deductible because the government is picking up all or part of the
cost.
What Bachmann fantasizes about is
having everyone skip off to their friendly offshore insurer and
shelling out big bucks up front that they might be able to get some
tax benefits from on the back end. That's how the wealthy folks
live, not the rest of us.
Make health care costs 100%
deductible
- Strange. Wouldn't that be like the
government picking up all of our health care costs by reimbursement
on the back end? What happened to that Health Savings Account idea
where contributions are limited to a fraction of what might actually
be paid in a year? I'm sure glad the Democrats are the fiscally
responsible party.
Tort reform
- The bill provides funding
and incentives for
states
to innovate around liability and tort issues.
Bachmann and the rest of her Republican cronies should know that
tort reform is a state-by-state
issue.
Jurisdiction for how torts are litigated belongs to
the states, not the federal government. After all, isn't that part
of the argument for repealing health care reform?
What struck me about Bachmann's
list of includes was what she
excluded.
Nothing about
pre-existing conditions exclusions. Nothing about lifetime caps. Nothing
about rescissions. Nothing about stopping insurers from excluding
children born with pre-existing conditions.
She didn't mention even one
of those. They didn't cross her mind. It wasn't an accident. The battle
lines were always drawn at pre-existing conditions. It's driving the
Republicans crazy that the middle class actually might be able to get
health care without selling their souls, homes and assets to do it.
Excerpt from an article in the Minnesota
Independent by
Paul Schmelzer 2/12/10 6:00 AM
A new survey of Minnesotans
shows that a majority of residents — 56 percent — are embarrassed by
Rep. Michele Bachmann. The release of the survey, commissioned by the
Progressive Change Campaign Committee, Democracy for America and Credo
Action, follows recent high-profile statements by Bachmann that she
believes President Barack Obama wants to
“annihilate” conservatives, that the U.S. faces a “curse” –
and extinction — if it fails to support Israel, and that
government must “wean”
Americans off of social safety net programs like Medicare and Social
Security.
The Bachmann survey results, released exclusively
to the Minnesota Independent, measure responses to the question, “Do you
think Congresswoman Michele Bachmann does Minnesota proud in Congress or
embarrasses Minnesota?” While 56 percent of respondents statewide said
they were embarrassed by Bachmann, 29 percent answered that they were
“proud” of the Sixth Congressional District Republican, and 15 percent
were “not sure.”
Predictably, 87 percent of Democrats polled said
they were embarrassed, while only 12 percent of Republicans agreed (58
pecent of Republican respondents said they were proud of Bachmann).
The survey of 600 Minnesotans gauged feedback based
on gender (by four percentage points, more women favored Bachmann than
men), race (55 percent of whites are embarrassed by the congresswoman,
while 80 percent of people of other races held that sentiment) and
congressional district.
Some surprises: While the Minneapolis-area district
represented by Democratic Rep. Keith Ellison led the state in finding
Bachmann an embarrassment, the relatively conservative District 8, the
northern Minnesota area represented by Rep. James Oberstar, came in
second, with 69 percent of respondents responding negatively to
Bachmann. In Bachmann’s own district, only 39 percent found her
embarrassing. However, a majority of surveyed independents — a
population likely to tilt the scales in Bachmann’s November election
against either DFL Sen. Tarryl Clark or Dr. Maureen Reed — responded
negatively to Bachmann, with 62 percent answering that she was
embarrassing.
The full survey, which will feature public opinions
on Sens. Al Franken and Amy Klobuchar, health care reform and the public
option, will be released next week.
Bachmann’s recent proclamations — which have
generated sharp reactions from candidates hoping to unseat her, as well
as a rebuttal by Bachmann, who decried what she characterizes as “political
grandstanding” — haven’t affected the outcome of this survey: It was
conducted by phone by Research 2000 on Jan. 31 and Feb. 1.
Excerpts from an
article at thinkprogess.org By Alex Seitz-Wald on Feb 2nd, 2010
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) painted an Orwellian vision of health
care reform yesterday, claiming that critics of the Democrats’ plan
could be denied coverage. Citing an unnamed Japanese man who
supposedly approached her in Washington, Bachmann suggested that critics
of the Japanese government are placed on a “list” and prohibited from
receiving medical care under Japan’s
universal health care system. Saying “a government takeover of
health care is the crown jewel of socialism,” Bachmann insinuated a
similar situation could occur in “our future”:
BACHMANN:
He
said that in Japan, to wait and get health care is almost
impossible. You get on a list and you wait and you wait and you
wait. But he said this is something people don’t know: in Japan,
people have stopped voicing their opinion on health care. There are
things that are wrong with Japanese health care, but people are
afraid of voicing. ‘Well why is that,’ I asked. [He said], ‘Because
they know that would get on a list and they wouldn’t get health
care. They wouldn’t get in. They wouldn’t get seen. And so people
are afraid. They’re afraid to speak back to government. They’re
afraid to say anything.’ Is that what we want for our future? That
takes us to gangster government at that point!
Watch it (beginning at 0:50):
Other than one individual’s account, Bachmann provides no evidence
to support her slur of Japan’s health care system, let alone any
evidence to suggest that the same thing would transpire in the U.S. The
Minneapolis Star Tribune’s Eric Roper “could
not find evidence to back up the claim that Japan withholds health
care from government critics.” He noted that a recent
Washington Post article “describing the pros and cons of the
Japanese health system makes no mention of it.”
Japan’s universal system has been able to keep
health care costs far lower than those in the U.S., despite an aging
population, allowing Japanese to visit a doctor nearly
14 times a year. Bachmann is also wrong when she claims that wait
times make it “almost impossible” to receive care in Japan. As ABC News
noted, “waiting lists are
not a major problem” in Japan, and patients can even “go to a doctor
without an appointment, but may have to sit for a long time in the
waiting room.”
The Republican National Committee made a similar false accusation
last August when it mailed a fundraising appeal that suggested that
Democrats might use an overhaul of the health care system to
deny medical treatment to Republicans.
Excerpts from an article by
Elon Green, Jun 16, 2011
Earlier this week, Rep.
Michele
announced she
had filed the papers to run for President. It’s not a frivolous
pursuit: She is extremely
well liked by
the Republican base and is an unusually effective fundraiser,
taking in more dollars
in the last election cycle she than any of her Congressional
colleagues.
Still, Bachmann’s
candidacy is not without potential landmines. Over the last decade,
she has taken positions that are dangerous, stemming from her
radical ideology.
To Bachmann’s credit, she is aware of this, lamenting to Glenn Beck,
“I have experienced that throughout my political career, being
labeled a kook.”
ThinkProgress has assembled 10
of the nuttiest things Bachmann has ever said:
(1) BACHMANN
WARNED ‘THE LION KING’ WAS GAY PROPAGANDA:
At the November 2004 EdWatch National Education Conference,
Bachmann
said the
“normalization” of homosexuality would lead to
“desensitization”: “Very effective way to do this with a bunch
of second graders, is
take a picture of ‘The Lion King’
for instance, and a teacher might say, ‘Do you know that the
music for this movie was written by a gay man?’ The message is:
I’m better at what I do, because I’m gay.”
(2) ENFORCED HOMOSEXUALITY.
"And
what a bizarre time we're in,
when a judge will say to little children that you can't say the
pledge of allegiance, but you must learn that homosexuality is
normal and you should try it."
(3)
"[GAY
MARRIAGE] is
probably the biggest issue that will impact our state and our
nation in the last, at least, thirty years. I am not
understating that."
(4) SLAVERY.
She Didn't know that founding Fathers Were Slave Holders.
"But we also know that the very founders that wrote those
documents worked tirelessly until
slavery was no more
in the United States."
(5) BACHMANN
CLAIMED ABOLISHING THE MINIMUM WAGE WOULD CREATE JOBS:
While testifying in front of the Minnesota Senate in 2005,
Bachmann said, “Literally, if we
took away the minimum wage
— if conceivably it was gone — we could potentially virtually
wipe out unemployment completely because we would be able to
offer jobs at whatever level.” This isn’t remotely true. Even
simply reducing the minimum wage would, as Paul Krugman
noted,
“at best do nothing for employment; more likely it would
actually be contractionary.”
(6) BACHMANN
CLAIMED THAT SCIENTISTS ARE SUPPORTERS OF INTELLIGENT DESIGN:
During a 2006 debate, Bachmann
said,
“There are hundreds and hundreds of scientists, many of them
holding Nobel Prizes, who believe in intelligent design.” This
was, and is, not true.
(7) BACHMANN
CLAIMED TERRI SCHIAVO WAS ‘HEALTHY’:
Not long after Terri Schiavo died, Bachmann said she would have
voted for the
Palm Sunday Compromise
because Schiavo “was
healthy. She had brain damage —
there was brain damage, there was no question. But from a health
point of view, she was not terminally ill.” An autopsy found
that Schiavo had suffered irreversible brain damage and her
brain, said the medical examiner, was “profoundly
atrophied.”
(8) OBAMA'S TRIP TO INDIA.
"The President of the United States will be taking a
trip over to India
that is expected to cost the taxpayers $200 million a day."
(9)
BACHMANN LIKENED VISITING IRAQ TO VISITING MALL OF AMERICA:
In 2007, Bachmann returned from a junket to Iraq and told her
colleagues, “[T]here’s a commonality
with the Mall of America,
in that it’s on that proportion. There’s marble everywhere. The
other thing I remarked about was there is water everywhere.” As
ThinkProgress documented
at the time,
the comparison was preposterous.
(10)
THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
"It is a brand new, billion-dollar high speed train that is
going to go from
Disneyland up to Las Vegas...Harry
Reid, the Senator from Nevada, was behind this measure, and it
makes us wonder, is he more interested in making sure kids start
gambling at younger ages?"
(11) BACHMANN
CLAIMED THAT CARBON DIOXIDE IS ‘HARMLESS’:
In 2008, a Stanford scientist revealed “direct links” between
increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and
“increases in human mortality” — globally, he found that as many
as “20,000
air-pollution-related deaths per year
per degree Celsius may be due to this greenhouse gas.” The next
year, Bachmann, who is not a scientist, said that “carbon
dioxide is portrayed as harmful. But there
isn’t even one study
that can be produced that shows that carbon dioxide is a harmful
gas.”
(12) BACHMANN CALLED
FOR A CONGRESSIONAL WITCH HUNT:
Pivoting off the news of Barack Obama’s alleged relationship to
former Weather Underground member William Ayers, and his former
pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Bachmann accused the candidate of
having “anti-American
views.” She then suggested that
Congressional liberals — including Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid —
ought to be subject to “an exposé” by the media because of their
views
"I wish the American media would take a great look at the views
of the people in Congress and find out: Are they
pro-America or anti-America?".
“I think people would love to see like that,” she told a stunned
Chris Matthews.
(13) BACHMANN
SUGGESTED GAY SINGER SHOULD REPENT AFTER GETTING CANCER:
Bachmann saw Melissa Etheridge’s cancer as a teachable moment:
“Unfortunately she is now suffering from breast cancer, so keep
her in your prayers,” she said in November 2004. “This may be an
opportunity for her now to be
open to some spiritual things,
now that she is suffering with that physical disease. She is a
lesbian.”
(14)
SWINE FLU
"I find it interesting that it was back in the 1970s that the
swine flu broke out then under another Democrat president Jimmy
Carter. And I'm not blaming this on President Obama, I just
think it's an interesting
coincidence."
(15)
BACHMANN BOASTED ABOUT BREAKING THE LAW:
In advance of the 2010 national Census, Bachmann told The
Washington Times that she would break
the law
by not completing the forms. “I know for my family, the only
question we will be answering is how many people are in our
home,” she said. “We
won’t be answering any information
beyond that, because the Constitution doesn’t require any
information beyond that.”
(16)
BACHMANN CLAIMED THAT GLENN BECK COULD
SOLVE THE DEBT CRISIS:
During a February trip to South Carolina, Bachmann told a South
Carolina audience, “I think if we
give Glenn Beck the numbers,
he can solve this [the national debt].”
Michele Marie Bachmann was born on
April 6, 1956 and is a Republican Congresswoman from Minnesota, a former
Senator, a homophobe, and a very disturbed woman.
In addition to being a disturbed
woman, Bachmann's track record has proven she is also a full-fledged
nutjob. The type of person that makes you turn to your friend the moment
she gets up to use the bathroom and mouth "She's craaaaaaazy," complete
with hand motions and bug-eyes.
While Bachmann has always been a
local nut, she didn't come onto the national crazy scene until the 2008
election when she accused Barack Obama and many members of Congress of
being "anti-American."
Like her pal Palin, Bachmann is
deceptively attractive. While Palin is attractive in a "if she just put
down that gun, took off those glasses, and started forming complete
sentences" sort of way, Bachmann has the whole girl next door thing
working for her. But only if you grew up next to an insane asylum.
Bachmann has claimed that many of
her career moves have been dictated by messages from God.
Abraham, Moses...Michele Bachmann.
That sounds about right.
Early Career
In 1993, Bachmann helped open the
New Heights Charter School in Stillwater, Minnesota. The school offered
a standard curriculum. You know, classes like biology, algebra, and
creationism. Bachmann and the board of directors advocated
that the "12 Christian Principles" be taught. These are very similar to
the commonly taught Bill of Rights, with the exception of the fact that
teaching them violates the First Amendment. Bachmann and other school
officials also refused to allow an in-school screening of "Aladdin,"
feeling that it endorsed witchcraft and promoted paganism.
Bachmann appeared before the
Stillwater School Board to address the parents' concerns. Standing by
her beliefs, she challenged them, asking, "Are you going to question my
integrity?" They did. By the end of the meeting, Bachmann resigned. At
the time, this seemed like a triumphant victory for all logical people.
However, her resignation afforded her the time to watch "Aladdin" and
study its black-magic teachings, skills she would later use when
conducting her own witch-hunt of Congress.
Anti-Americans
In October 2008, Bachmann appeared
on MSNBC's "Hardball" with Chris Matthews. When talking about Obama's
association with Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright, she stated he and his
wife, Michele, held anti-American views and couldn't be trusted in the
White House. She even called for the major newspapers of the country to
investigate other members of Congress to "find out if they are
pro-America or anti-America." For the record, Bachmann defines "America"
as "star, bars, and white people."
When asked which parts of the
country were anti-American, Bachmann replied, "I don't think it's
geography. I think it's people who don't like America, who detest
America." You know, the types of people that would organize a witch-hunt
of Congress and imply the future President is a terrorist. They can
exist anywhere. Like Minnesota.
The reactions to her statements
were overwhelmingly negative, with even Republicans distancing
themselves from this crazy lady. At the cemetery where Joe McCarthy is
buried, a groundskeeper heard a questioning "Ummmmmm..." come from the
grave of the former Senator and Commie-Hunting ass h_le.
Bachmann's statements were
especially nutsoid, considering that calling someone "anti-American" is
as original as a schoolyard bully calling other kids "gay." Speaking of
gays...
Opposition to Gay Rights
In 2003, Bachmann began her yearly
assault on gay rights, proposing a constitutional amendment that would
ban same-sex marriage. In 2004, Bachmann and a coalition of religious
leaders announced plans for what was billed as a "Minnesota for
Marriage" rally. Thousands of people attended, holding signs that read,
"Gays Should Not Be Married, Dontchya Know."
Shocked that her views were not
universal, Bachmann felt the need to investigate her opposition. At a
2005 protest of her proposed constitutional ban of same-sex marriage,
Bachmann and her cronies were actually seen hiding in the bushes, spying
on the rally. When reached for comment regarding the incident, Bachmann
complained that her feet were sore, saying, "I had high heels on and I
just couldn't stand anymore. I was not in the bushes." The last part is
true, as she was hiding behind the bushes. Getting in them would just be
insane. Bachmann later acknowledged that she was spying on the rally,
but only because she heard a "dirty rumor that they may screen
'Aladdin,' and 'Aladdin' can't get any gayer."
Bachmann has been on record saying
that homosexuals specifically target children and that "our
children...are the prize for this community." This knowledge was accrued
when Bachmann hid in the bushes during an annual Pedophiles and
Homosexuals Mixer where they laid out their plan to join forces and
bring down society, specifically to spite Michele Bachmann.
During a 2005 community meeting in
Scandia, Minnesota, Bachmann was seen running out of a public bathroom
crying, "I was being held against my will." In a report filed with the
country sheriff, Bachmann claimed that two women "believed to be part of
a LGBT group" detained her in the bathroom. She apparently was terrified
and feared for her life. The women in question claimed they were simply
making conversation with their local senator while waiting in line. The
case was dismissed.
Oh, Irony!
Michele Bachmann's stepsister is a
lesbian.
AmeriCorps
On April Fool's Day of 2009,
Bachmann focused her wrath on AmeriCorps, the federal government program
that provides public education for disadvantaged children and aid to the
poor. Though it is viewed as a way to get young people involved in
community service, Bachmann, not surprisingly, does not approve of its
existence.
"It's paying people to do work on
behalf of government," she said. "There are provisions for what I would
call re-education camps for young people, where young people get trained
in the philosophy the government puts forward and then they have to go
work in these politically correct forums." She then added,"As a parent,
I would have a very, very difficult time seeing my children do this."
In another one of life's wonderful
ironies, Bachmann's son, Harrison, has recently joined one of
AmeriCorps' larger branches, Teach For America. While most of Bachmann's
detractors have been thrilled to hear this, they may have jumped the
gun. Clearly this is part of Bachmann's elaborate plan. There's no way
her son would defy her and join such a Communist institution. Obviously,
Harrison is so patriotic that he's joining Teach For America so he can
infiltrate AmeriCorps and find all the anti-Americans. This is one
American who won't be brainwashed to think he can help others in need.
He will bring justice!
Or at least that's what Michele has
had to convince herself of. You know,
because...
She's Crazy
If you give Michele Bachmann a
microphone, there's a pretty solid chance she'll say something stupid.
The kinds of statements that leave you speechless - not because you
don't know how to respond, but because there is no applicable response
to gibberish.
Here's a sampling of her work:
"Don't Palinize Me!"
"Not all cultures are equal."
"We're running out of rich people
in this country."
"I find it interesting that it was
back in the 1970s that the swine flu broke out then under another
Democrat president Jimmy Carter. And I'm not blaming this on President
Obama, I just think it's an interesting coincidence."
"Little children will be forced to
learn that homosexuality is normal and natural and perhaps they should
try it."
Michele Bachmann's statements are
so inane that at some level, one must cut her some slack. Why? No human
can be that much of a jerk. No real person acts like that. Maybe she's
mentally ill. And if that's the case, it's just weird that we'd call an
escaped mental patient a jerk nutsoid.
But until that's proven...Michele
Bachmann is a jerk.
"Michele Bachmann is one of the great
pulsars of our times: a collapsed gravity well of unblinking stare.
People innocently walking down the street, are drawn into her orbit,
helplessly drawn in by how utterly dense she is. They cannot
escape the completely impenetrable mass of darkness surrounding her mind
and become totally crushed & moronized by her."
This is
the GOP strategy? They're going to try to appeal to stressed-out
soccer moms to stop healthcare reform? I'm stunned at the sheer
brilliance - not to mention that smug attitude that some people's
children are more important that others:
Why offer more people health
insurance, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) asked at a press
conference Friday, if they might lengthen waits for doctors and
otherwise increase the "hassle factor" for her?
"That's like having a mother
bear protecting her little cubs, and she's seeing that she has to
move heaven and earth to get her child what her child needs,"
Bachmann said, referring to the health care reforms being debated by
Congress. "We'll do it if we have to, but why put ourselves in that
situation?"
Near the end of a tumultuous
week of delays for health care bills in both houses of Congress,
Bachmann and a handful of other House Republican women said at a
press conference that as far as they were concerned, any reform
would just make things tougher for them.
"I think most all of us here
have had the opportunity to take our kids to a fast-food
restaurant," said Rep. Judy Biggert (R-Ill.). "We want to get a good
dinner, and you walk in and there's 50 people there and it seems
like everybody in line wants to buy food for their soccer team or
whatever. The American people aren't particularly good at standing
in line, but that's exactly what's going to happen if this health
care plan goes through."
Uh, Judy? If I wanted to get a
"good dinner" for my kids, I wouldn't be taking them out for fast
food. Perhaps the clogged arteries explain the reduced oxygen to
your brain?
"Any mother," Bachmann
said, would do whatever it takes to get "the high-quality health
care that her child needs... As a mother of five biological
children and as a foster mother to 23 children, there is nothing
more important to me than to make sure that my children have
high-quality health care when they need health care."
Millions of other children,
however, do not have the resources that Members of Congress enjoy.
New U.S. Census data document that more than 8.1 million, or one in
nine, American children did not have health insurance in 2007.
According to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, nearly 20 percent
of the uninsured in the U.S. are children.
Health Reform
Will Lead To 'Sex Clinics'
During the
long road to health
care reform in the fall of 2009, Bachmann took to the House floor to
warn members of congress that
"sex clinics"
would result from passing legislation that was under debate at the
time.
The Tea Party favorite suggested that if reform were to
pass, schools might begin offering abortions to students given her
interpretation that the measure was designed to bring Planned
Parenthood into educational facilities:
The bill goes on
to say what's going to go on -- comprehensive primary
health services, physicals, treatment of minor acute
medical conditions, referrals to follow-up for specialty
care -- is that abortion? Does that mean that someone's
13 year-old daughter could walk into a sex clinic, have
a pregnancy test done, be taken away to the local
Planned Parenthood abortion clinic, have their abortion,
be back and go home on the school bus that night? Mom
and dad are never the wiser.
Section 2511 of the
health care bill referred to by Bachmann, makes no mention of
abortion and stipulates:
(i) "SBHC
services will be provides in accordance with Federal,
State, and local laws governing-- (I) obtaining parental
or guardian consent; and (II) patient privacy and
student records, including section 264 of the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and
section 444 of the General Education Provision Act;
We see no language
in the three main versions of the bill that would allow
school-based clinics, which have a long history of
providing basic health services to underprivileged
students, to provide abortions. Nor would the clinics
even be new they have been around for three decades. So
we rate the claim Pants on Fire!
Bachmann joined fellow
controversy-prone
Republican Congressional candidate, Allen Quist, at a health care
forum back in February, and suggested that health care reform would
lead to a "gangster government" that would prevent those who
criticized reform from receiving care.
To reach her
conclusion, the Minnesota representative
explained
her understanding of the Japanese health care system (as told to her
by someone who had lived in Japan):
In Japan...to wait in
and get health care is almost impossible. You get on a list and
you wait and you wait and you wait. But he said this is
something people don't know: in Japan, people have stopped
voicing their opinion on health care. There are things that are
wrong with Japanese health care, but people [aren't] voicing.
'Well why is that,' I asked. He said it's 'Because they know
that would get on a list and they wouldn't get health care. They
wouldn't get in. They wouldn't get seen. And so people are
afraid. They're afraid to speak back to government. They're
afraid to say anything.' Is that what we want for our future?
That takes us to gangster government at that point! And absolute
abject corruption.
Nevertheless, Bachmann finished her speech
by vowing not to give up her fight against the current health care
reform bill, calling "government takeover of health care...the crown
jewel of socialism."
Excerpted from an article by
Yasha Levine on truthdig.com on Dec 22, 2009
AP / Charles Dharapak
Although Michele Bachmann has
become well known for her anti-government tea-bagger antics, protesting
health care reform and every other government “handout” as socialism,
what her followers probably don’t know is that Rep. Bachmann is, to use
that anti-government slur, something of a Welfare Queen. That’s right,
the anti-government insurrectionist has taken more than a
quarter-million dollars in government handouts thanks to corrupt farming
subsidies she has been collecting for at least a decade.
Bachmann, has spent much of this
year agitating against health care reform, whipping up the so-called
tea-baggers with stories of death panels and rationed health care. She
has called for a revolution against what she sees as Barack Obama’s
attempted socialist takeover of America, saying presidential policy is
“reaching down the throat and ripping the guts out of freedom.”
But data compiled from federal
records by Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit watchdog that tracks
the recipients of agricultural subsidies in the United States, shows
that Bachmann has an inner Marxist that is perfectly at ease with
profiting from taxpayer largesse. According to the organization’s
records, Bachmann’s family farm received $251,973 in federal subsidies
between 1995 and 2006. The farm had been managed by Bachmann’s recently
deceased father-in-law and took in roughly $20,000 in 2006 and $28,000
in 2005, with the bulk of the subsidies going to dairy and corn. Both
dairy and corn are heavily subsidized—or “socialized”—businesses in
America (in 2005 alone, Washington spent $4.8 billion propping up corn
prices) and are subject to strict government price controls. These
subsidies are at the heart of America’s bizarre planned agricultural
economy and as far away from Michele Bachmann’s free-market dream world
as Cuba’s free medical system. If American farms such as hers were
forced to compete in the global free market, they would collapse.
However, Bachmann doesn’t think
other Americans should benefit from such protection and assistance. She
voted against every foreclosure relief bill aimed at helping average
homeowners (despite the fact that her district had the highest
foreclosure rate in Minnesota), saying that bailing out homeowners would
be “rewarding the irresponsible while punishing those who have been
playing by the rules.” That’s right, the subsidy queen wants the rest of
us to be responsible.
Bachmann’s financial
disclosure forms indicate that her personal stake in the family farm is
worth up to $250,000. They also show that she has been earning income
from the farm business, and that the income grew in just a few years
from $2,000 to as much as $50,000 for 2008. This has provided her with a
second government-subsidized income to go with her job as a
government-paid congresswoman who makes $174,000 per year (in addition
to having top-notch government medical benefits). “If she has an
interest in a farm getting federal subsidy payments, she is benefiting
from them,” Sandra Schubert, director of government affairs for the
Environmental Working Group, told Gannett News Service in 2007, when the
subsidies to Bachmann were first publicly disclosed.
UPDATE
WASHINGTON June 27, 2011 from the
McClatchy Report at mcclatchydc.com
Rep. Michele Bachmann has been
propelled into the 2012 presidential contest in part by her insistent
calls to reduce federal spending, a pitch in tune with the
big-government antipathy gripping many conservatives.
But the Minnesota Republican and
her family have benefited personally from government aid, an examination
of her record and finances shows. A counseling clinic run by her husband
has received nearly $30,000 from the state of Minnesota in the last five
years, money that in part came from the federal government. A family
farm in Wisconsin, in which the congresswoman is a partner, received
nearly $260,000 in federal farm subsidies.
And she has sought to keep federal
money flowing to her constituents. After publicly criticizing the Obama
administration's stimulus program, Bachmann requested stimulus funds to
support projects in her district. Although she has been a fierce critic
of earmarks — calling them "part of the root problem with Washington's
spending addiction" — the Minnesota congresswoman nonetheless argued
recently that transportation projects should not be considered
congressional pork.
As Bachmann prepares to formally
launch her presidential bid Monday in Waterloo, Iowa, Republican
strategists warned that she needs to square her record with her public
pronouncements.
"She's kind of built an area in the
field of candidates where she's the hawk on those kinds of issues, so
any sort of issue that will show her record is not totally consistent
will affect some of her support," said Craig Robinson, a former
political director of the Iowa GOP. "I don't think it's a deal-breaker,
but I think it's something she's going to have to be willing to confront
head-on."
For now, Bachmann is declining to
answer questions on the topic. Her congressional and campaign staff did
not respond to numerous requests for comment.
Bachmann has long sought to
distance herself from those who benefit from public money. "I don't need
government to be successful," she proudly told Fox News host Bill
O'Reilly in fall 2009 when he asked why she inspired such ire among
liberal critics.
Yet despite her broadsides against
"socialized medicine," Bachmann's husband, Marcus, applied for public
funds for his counseling clinic, Bachmann & Associates. Since 2006, he
has received nearly $30,000, according to Minnesota state records. The
bulk of the money — $24,041 — came in the form of grants from the state
Department of Human Services to train staff how to deal with clients
suffering from chemical dependency and mental illness. That program was
financed in part by the federal government.
Michele Bachmann lists the Lake
Elmo, Minn.-based clinic — which aims to provide "quality Christian
counseling in a sensitive, loving environment," according to its website
— as one of her assets on her financial disclosure forms.
Another of Bachmann's assets — a
family farm owned by her late father-in-law, Paul Bachmann — received
nearly $260,000 in federal money between 1995 and 2008, largely from
corn and dairy subsidies, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture
data compiled by the Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit research
organization that scrutinizes such subsidies. Paul Bachmann died in May
2009, but the congresswoman retains a partnership in the farm.
Bachmann said in December that the
subsidies went to her in-laws and she never received "one penny" from
the farm, according to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. However, in
financial disclosure forms, she reported receiving between $32,503 and
$105,000 in income from the farm, at minimum, between 2006 and 2009.
Publicly, Bachmann has objected
strongly to federal farm payments.
When she voted against the 2008
farm bill, a $307 billion package that would govern federal agriculture
policy for five years, Bachmann declared that it was "loaded with
unbelievably outrageous pork and subsidies for agricultural business and
ethanol growers." She was one of two nays cast by Minnesota's
eight-member delegation.
Just a year later, however,
Bachmann wrote to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, praising the
federal government for helping prop up the prices of pig products and
dairy by directly buying the commodities, a move that benefitted her
constituents.
"I would encourage you to take any
additional steps necessary to prevent further deterioration of these
critical industries, such as making additional commodity purchases," she
wrote on Oct. 5, 2009. The Los Angeles Times/Tribune Washington Bureau
obtained the letter through a Freedom of Information Act request.
The USDA that year had stepped up
its purchase of pork and dairy products for use in school lunches and
other government food programs, seeking to stabilize prices in the
then-flagging industries.
While not technically a subsidy,
commodity purchase programs are "a deliberate effort of the government
to prop up these industries," said David DeGennaro, legislative analyst
for the Environmental Working Group.
More recently, Bachmann objected
strongly to the Obama administration's $830 billion stimulus package,
saying before the 2009 congressional vote on the matter: "I cannot
support this new direction for the American economy."
But seven months later, Bachmann
wrote six letters to Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood asking for
stimulus-financed grants for infrastructure projects in her district,
such as expanding commuter rail and constructing a bridge over St. Croix
River. (The letters were first reported by the Center for Public
Integrity.)
In the end, none of the requests
received funding, according to the Minnesota Department of
Transportation. Bachmann continues to blast the stimulus, saying in her
State of the Union response in January that "the president's strategy
for recovery was to spend a trillion dollars on a failed stimulus
program, fueled by borrowed money."
GOP strategist Steve Grubbs said he
didn't view Bachmann's requests as damaging to her fiscal credibility.
"Just because you're against
government spending doesn't mean you shouldn't get any funds you're
legally entitled to," said Grubbs, a former chairman of the Iowa
Republican Party. "Lobbying for basic transportation needs in your
district is what your job is as a congresswoman. If she was lobbying to
put a rainforest in Minnesota, I think people would see that as
disingenuous."
Bachmann told the Minneapolis
Star-Tribune in November that transportation projects should not be
considered earmarks. "There's a big difference between funding a tea pot
museum and a bridge over a vital waterway," she said.
Steve Ellis, vice president of
Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan budget watchdog group, said
such reasoning was "ridiculous," adding: "That sounds like a pretty big
loophole to me."
As Bachmann pursues the presidency,
Ellis said, her record will face tougher scrutiny.
"If you want to talk about the debt
and deficit and reigning in wasteful spending, you have to look in the
mirror and make sure you're living a fiscally pure life as well," he
said.
In March, the 2010 Census will be
sent to every American household,
as required by the U.S. Constitution.
The far right has issued dire warnings of the Census; on a May 29th
episode of Bill Bennett’s radio show, RNC Chairman Michael Steele
intoned, “Certainly the collection of this information is going to be
part of an ongoing political campaign by this administration.”
In an interview with the Washington
Time’s right-wing radio show this morning, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN)
declared that she would
break the law and refuse to answer the Census
questions, beyond noting the number of people in her
household:
BACHMANN:
The motherload of all data
information will be from the Census. … Unfortunately, the Census
data has become very intricate, very personal, a lot of the
questions that are asked. I know for my family, the only question we
will be answering is how many people are in our home. We won’t be
answering any information beyond that, because the Constitution
doesn’t require any information beyond that.
Listen to it:
Bachmann explained that her fears
over the Census were in large part due to the fact that her
Number-One Enemy,
ACORN, could possibly be involved. (The group might help
recruit some of the 1.4 million people
needed to go door-to-door to count every American.) She insinuated that
former senator Norm Coleman (R-MN) had lost his reelection bid because
of “fraudulent votes” perpetrated by ACORN:
BACHMANN:
This is what ACORN will do. They will
get multiple fraudulent voter registration forms, stuff the
registrar’s office with them, in hopes that maybe not all fraudulent
registrations will find people at the polls voting. But there may be
some people who get through. And sometimes you don’t often need many
in order to sway an election one way or another. I come from
Minnesota. We’re still in a recount with our U.S. Senate race
between Sen. Norm Coleman and the challenger Al Franken. Sen.
Coleman won the race on election day, but that was challenged
repeatedly, over and over, with what we feel may be fraudulent vote
[sic], and we’re very concerned about what comes forward.
At the end of the interview,
Bachmann declares it to be a “badge of honor” to be a “target” of the
press.
This is an ode to Michele
Bachmann by Eric.Arthur.Blair 7/3/11 - The original is Bette Davis Eyes, written by Donna Weiss and
Jackie DeShannon in 1974 and made a hit by Kim Carnes in 1981.
Her speech is Glenn Beck
gold
Her grimace sweet surprise
Her heart is always cold
She's got Charlie Manson eyes
She'll turn her rhetoric on you
You won't have to think twice
Cold as Minnesota snow
She got Charlie Manson eyes
And she'll tease you
She'll unease you
All the better just to sleaze you
She's precocious and she knows just
What it takes to make a Rove blush
She got John Boehner teary cries
She's got Charlie Manson eyes
She'll take you to the
cleaners
It whets her appetite
She'll lay you on her slab
She'll take a dump on you
Roll you like you were dice
Until you come out blue
She's got Charlie Manson eyes
She'll expose you, when she
snows you
Off your feet with the crumbs she throws you
She's ferocious and she knows just
What it takes to make a Rove blush
Republicans think she's a guy
She's got Charlie Manson eyes
And she'll tease you
She'll unease you
All the better just to sleaze you
She's precocious, and she knows just
What it takes to make a Rove blush
She got John Boehner teary cries
She's got Charlie Manson eyes
She'll tease you
She'll unease you
Just to sleaze ya
She's got Charlie Manson eyes
She'll expose you, when she snows you
She knows ya
She's got Charlie Manson eyes
For information on all individuals
and organizations listed in this website, or the name of a contact person in
your area that can give you further information on the Religious Freedom
Coalition of the Southeast, or the First Amendment Coalition, contact us at
dynionmwyn23@hotmail.com. Let us hear from you!
You may call also call us at
000-000-0000 If you access our voice mail, we will call you back collect
if long distance.
Or, you can write to us at:
RFCSE, P.O. Box
673206, Marietta, GA 30006-0036
There have been
8,732,951 visitors to this page since January 1,
2009
This site created by Georgia First Amendment Coalition
design copyright 2010 by Religion Freedom Coalition of the South East
- This page was last changed on
12/01/2011 04:42 PM