The Two Faces of Senator John McCain
Is He a Traitor to America?
BACHMANN | RICHARD
M. SCAIFE | JOHN
ENSIGN | MARK
SANFORD | SAM
| TOM COBURN
GARY BAUER | DAN BURTON | | JOHN BARRASSO | DICK ARMEY | LAMAR ALEXANDER | MAX BAUCUS | GARY BAUER | THE BIRTHERS
ROY BLUNT | JOHN BOEHNER | KIT BOND | JIM BUNNING | RICHARD BURR | KEN CALVERT | ERIC CANTOR | SAXBY CHAMBLISS | TOM COBURN
BOB CORKER CHUCK GRASSLEY | SEN. CORNYN | ANN COULTER | JIM INHOFE | JIM DEMINT | BILL NELSON | PAT ROBERTSON | ADOLPH COORS
JAMES DOBSON | LATE JERRY FALWELL SEN. CRAPO | TOM DELAY | RICHARD DEVOS | DICK CHENEY | DOUG LAMBORN | THE FAR RIGHT PURPOSE
GIULIANI | GLENN BECK LINDSEY GRAHAM | JUDD GREGG | JEFF GANNON | REPUBLICAN HALL OF SHAME | SEAN HANNITY | HEALTHCARE REFORM
LARRY PRATT | WALLY HERGER | MIKE HUCKABEE JOHNNY ISAKSON | JEB BUSH | MIKE JOHANNS | JOHN MCCAIN | MITCH MCCONNEL
DICK MORRIS | NEWT GINGRICH | BILL O'REILLY | RUSH LIMBAUGH SARAH PALIN | SEN. RISCH | PAUL ROBERTSON | SEN. ROBERTS
GEORGE ROCHE | MITT ROMNEY | RONALD REAGAN | KARL ROVE | SEN. SESSIONS | RICHARD SHELBY | TOM TANCREDO | TRENT FRANKS
REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED FOR RAPE | LT. GOV. ANDRE BAUER | CHRISTIAN HIJACK | FOX NEWS MICHELLE MALKIN | MARK PRYOR
MIKE MCINTYRE | JOE PITTS | HEATH SHULER | BART STUPAK | CHRISTIAN RECONSTRUCTIONISTS | ZACK WAMP | FRANK WOLF
CHIP PICKERING | TEA BAGGERS | JOHN ASHCROFT | LOUIS SHELDON | WYLY BROTHERS | GEORGE W. BUSH UNOFFICIAL PAGE | THE FAMILY
Presented by: The Religious Freedom Coalition of the SouthEast
All who donate will
receive a 23 page professional Horoscope!
To Donate by Credit Card click on the Button Below
Thank You for Whatever you can do.
If you are interested in becoming Spiritually Enlightened...Click HERE or on the Red Dragon Below. You will be taken to a page which will reveal the gateway to Enlightenment.
Click on the below image and read the Quest - you will discover the secret Grail of Immortality. Then click on and read the Way and finally The Word. The three books are available in Kindle format. Go to Barnes and Noble for Nook format.
Go to http://professionalleft.blogspot.com for a treat!!!
"Separation between Church and State." Who coined the Phrase?
Give up? Answer: Thomas Jefferson - one of the
founding fathers of this great Nation and a creator of the U.S.
Constitution and the First Amendment to that same Constitution.
Thomas Jefferson, in 1802, wrote a Letter to
the Dansbury Baptist Convention, referring to the First Amendment to
the US Constitution. In it he said:
Newsweek: McCains Default On Home Taxes For Four Years, Face Penalties!!!!!!!!
29 Jun 2008
And this man is asking us to trust him with our economy?
Newsweek:When you?re poor, it can be hard to pay the bills. When you?re rich, it?s hard to keep track of all the bills that need paying. It?s a lesson Cindy McCain learned the hard way when NEWSWEEK raised questions about an overdue property-tax bill on a La Jolla, Calif., property owned by a trust that she oversees. Mrs. McCain is a beer heiress with an estimated $100 million fortune and, along with her husband, she owns at least seven properties, including condos in California and Arizona.
Officials, it turns out, have been sending out tax notices on the La Jolla property, an oceanfront condo, for four years without receiving a response. County records show the bills, which were mailed to a Phoenix address associated with Mrs. McCain?s trust, were returned by the post office. According to a McCain campaign aide, who requested anonymity when discussing a private matter, an elderly aunt of Mrs. McCain?s lives in the condo, and the bank that manages the trust has not been receiving tax bills on the property. Shortly after NEWSWEEK inquired about the matter, the McCain aide e-mailed a receipt dated Friday, June 27, confirming payment by the trust to San Diego County in the amount of $6,744.42. County officials say the trust still owes an additional $1,742 for this year, an amount that is overdue and will go into default July 1. Told of the outstanding $1,742, the aide said: ?The trust has paid all bills shown owing as of today and will pay all other bills due.? Read on?
This situation has nothing to do with the ongoing mortgage foreclosure crisis brought on by 8 years of Republican rule and deregulation, this is about a real failure of personal responsibility on the part of the McCains. I realize that they live an elite life of luxury and privilege and have more money and assets than 99% of Americans will ever know in their lifetime, but this is ridiculous. They didn?t pay the taxes on this home for four years. Don?t they pay people to pay their bills for them? Is this representative of the way John McCain will run OUR budgets? No matter how much cash they have or how many vacation homes they have to keep track of, it pales in comparison to running the U.S. economy.
FLASH!!! McCain Fundraiser's Firm Pleaded Guilty To Funding Terrorist Group In Colombia!!!
FLASH!!! McCain Campaign Sees Benefits of Terrorist Attack
In an interview with Fortune magazine, Sen. John McCain's chief strategist, Charlie Black, concedes with "startling candor" that another terrorist attack on U.S. soil would be a big benefit for the Arizona senator's campaign.
Said Black: "Certainly it would be a big advantage to him."
This is the kind of remark the Kark Rove was famous for. It was also similar to the remark that George W. Bush made after the 9/11 event: "I just hit the Trifecta" refering to the two towers in the World Trade Center and the Pentagon attack. (A trifecta is when you hold the winning ticket for the first three horses crossing the finish line in the Kentucky Derby.)
Is John McCain as Honest as He Claims?
We will leave it up to the reader to determine whether Sen. John McCain has made serious errors in veracity and judgment. Sen. McCain has seemed to support a Moderate Christian position especially when it comes to Church and State issues. It is apparent from the data collected though, that Ethical Values and the first amendment may be in danger from his past and future actions.
John McCain's office like others we called, stated that his position is that no religion but Christianity is a "Real" religion." Are you pandering to the Christian Right Senator McCain? What is a real religion, Mr. McCain? What you have been practicing? Then it should be made illegal. Read the following and remember: "By their Works may they be known." This is a summary of information collected from several sources about Sen. John McCain.
John McCain is a maverick senator, Vietnam veteran and former prisoner of war for 5 years in North Vietnam. In 2000, he nearly beat George W. Bush by being an outspoken, even honest politician, which stunned everybody. He also is known for crafting bipartisan approaches to issues such as smoking and campaign reform.
This time around though, at 71, he apparently decided "now or never" and seems to have sold his soul, suddenly adopting a bunch of boilerplate conservative positions he was brave enough to resist 8 years ago. Now, conveniently, he's even claiming to be a Baptist instead of an Episcopalian.
It didn't look like anyone was buying it for a while there, but danged if he hasn't come back and pretty much sewed up the Republican nomination. McCain went from front runner to 3rd or 4th in various polls, spent all of his huge pile of cash and lost most of his staff, and worked his way back into a dominant position.
(Remember it is best to investigate on your own when looking at allegations about anyone. Don't believe us, think for yourself and investigate for yourself! And remember, the Religious Freedom Coalition does not represent any political party nor do we recommend any political candidate, nor are we involving ourselves in the political process. This information is only for students of Sen. John McCain)
The Many Faces of John McCain
Excerpted from an Article in the Huffington Post, by Jayne Lyn Stahl
April 30, 2008
While Barack Obama is said to be
outraged about the latest sound bites coming from his former minister,
Reverend Jeremiah Wright, where is our outrage at all the nonstop coverage
of this nonsense, and the egregious efforts to abort the First Amendment
guarantee of separation between church and state?
Now that we know everything we ever wanted to know about Reverend Jeremiah Wright, and more that we didn't, now that ballistics test show the efficacy of weapons of mass distraction when it comes to news delivery vehicles, maybe it's time some chickens come home to roost for those who have gotten a free ride from the mainstream media. Forget about how many people can name even one Supreme Court justice. How about -- how many people can name John McCain's position on abstinence-only HIV/AIDS funding? Roe v. Wade? Gun control? Iran?
Who cares, after all, anyway? Why interrupt a politcal lynching to interject substance into an otherwise vacuous campaign. After all, who can forget when the senator from Arizona numbly repeated "We do not torture" while on a recent visit to Europe. I'd like to ask Senator McCain if the Justice Department will look any different under him than under his predecessor, George W. Bush, or if we may expect to see the FBI look the other way when the CIA engages in interrogation techniques that violate Geneva, and the Eighth Amendment proscription against cruel and unusual punishment. But, why challenge him when nobody else is.
Why, after all, would anyone question
the current dangerous liaision between Hillary and McCain -- both claiming
that Obama is out of touch with "ordinary Americans" while benefiting from
millions raked in by their significant others, both pushing for a reprieve
from the pump.. Oh, and excuse me, but does anyone really believe that the
Clintons earned over $100 million, over the past seven years, from book
sales and lectures? But, who cares the truth when fiction is so compelling.
Like the truth that both Hillary Clinton and John McCain want to move us from supply side economics to "bandaid "economics, to a place where we'll be happy with the meager 18 cent saving on gas tax while the capital gains tax continues to be reduced, and corporate America gets to gorge itself on even more tax credits and tax write-offs. Who cares if, as Obama suggests, reducing the cost of gas, for the summer, is only a "short-term, quick-fix,", and doesn't solve the problem. Who wants to solve the problem anyway? What for? After all, isn't that what a second term is for?
And, who cares about credibility? So what if John McCain has more faces than the legendary Greek goddess, Janus, all sharing one common denominator -- they aim to please. So, if you don't like this side of McCain, he's got another, and yet another. John McCain has more sides than your average garden variety cineplex, but nobody in the mainstream media is going to let his many inconguities interfere with their insatiable urge to vomit sound byte invectives from the mouth of Obama's retired minister. Rather sinister the treatment the Arizona senator gets from those whose job it is not merely to cover, but to uncover, the news; almost as sinister as a one size fits all nightmare.
How can we resist photo-ops from the presumptive Republican presidential nominee? Shots of McCain retracing the footsteps of another president, Lyndon Johnson, in Kentucky, talking about how he plans to help those who suffer through no fault of their own. And, oh, how he likes to help those who suffer effortlessly -- like those who lost their homes, as long as they didn't buy those homes for investment purposes, and those who are jobless because they are looking for work, but can't find it. Can it be that his Party is setting it up so that only those in the upper one percent have the opportunity to see profit from anything they do? And, where are the sound bytes for that one!
Yes, watch Johnny venture forth into New Orleans where he assures us that, like his compassionate conservative brothers, he will never allow another "failure in leadership" like Katrina while, at the same time, virtually guaranteeing a projected budget shortfall of $400 billion. Indeed, this is responsible leadership with a capital "R" -- as in "recession."
Oh, and all this noise about suspending the tax on gasoline, for the summer, so that people can not only drive more, and vacation, but spend more of those tax rebates that are in the mail. Gas tax relief is not unlike the Bush rebate -- yes, folks, both shining examples of bandaid economics. Neither Clinton nor McCain is atttacking the gaping hole that lurks in America's driveway -- the one that threatens to consume us all while making the oil barons richer, with their spend until you mend ethos. Oh, and let's not increase the corporate gains tax, people, let's decrease corporate income tax, and enhance the list of things businesses get to write off while one in five children in America goes to bed hungry
Remember, too, McCain announced Tuesday a proposed $5,000 tax credit for health insurance, and his so-called free market approach to health care. How remarkably like Bush's approach to social security reform. So close, we won't feel a thing after the inauguration. In fact, we may not feel a thing for years to come. The idea of privatizing social services, and leaving it up to the individual to find their way out of hardship, especially at a time when 40 million Americans are uninsured, is not merely reckless, it's downright neanderthal.
So, who is the Republican
nominee-in-waiting trying to kid when he says he wants to fight a war on
poverty. Isn't that kind of like a war on terror -- except it costs a lot
less? Just how many of the millions of those without health insurance will
benefit from the tax credit to choose your own health care provider McCain
proposes? You can bet many more who go to his country club will benefit from
his suppport for capital gains cuts, and tax breaks for the wealthy. And yet
the mainstream media so fixated on the hyperbole of Reverend Wright? Are we
witnessing, yet again, media complicity in a campaign of distortion and
disinformation in the name of boosting corporate revenue?
Yes, and what about that very public face McCain put forward in Kentucky when he said that Barack Obama is out of touch with America's poor? How can anyone claim to care about poverty and hunger while, at the same time, striving to ease the tax burden on those who least suffer from tax burdens?
Let's not forget, too, the side of Senator McCain that just voted against a Senate bill which would ensure gender equity with respect to wages.
Irony of ironies: the John McCain we saw
in New Orleans is the same one who didn't think Martin Luther King's
birthday should be a national holiday, and the same McCain whose parody
"Bomb Iran" exploded all over the world wide web; yes, the same one who
suffered painful, lifelong injuries at the hands of his captors while a
prisoner of war, and who wants to send our sons and daughters back for
another hundred years all in the name of bigger profits for Halliburton and
Yet, with all this focus pocus on the excesses of one Democratic candidate's former Baptist preacher, John McCain remains largely impregnable. He 's getting away with not not talking about his stand on Roe v. Wade, gun control, stem cell research, withdrawal of troops from Iraq, how it is that the oil companies are making record profits when, by his own admission, his tax proposals will cost taxpayers close to $200 billion annually. He's getting away with economic policies that virtually guarantee college, and cars, are possible only for the very rich.
Not only can we not look forward to an
exit strategy with respect to Iraq from the Republicans. It's clear they
have no exit strategy for recession, either.
Information is often the first casualty of arbitrary power, and there is nothing more tenacious than arbitrary power. In a culture of rabid narcissism, how refreshing to see a candidate take time out to split himself into as many parts as necessary to make sure that he wins as big a chunk of the election pie as humanly possible. The question isn't so much who is pulling McCain's strings as who has been in bed with him throughout the process, as well as who is helping the Republicans "politicize" Reverend Wright to sabotage a candidate who has been consistently ahead in pledged delegates, and popular votes. If the phenomenon that is Barack Obama is larger than Obama, the McCain factor is larger than anything McCain himself could ever have imagined.
For all the coverage this week about John McCain's background, there are some important things you won't learn about him from the TV networks. His carefully crafted positive image relies on people not knowing this stuff?and you might be surprised by some of it.
Please check out the list below, and then forward it to your friends, family, and coworkers. We can't rely on the media to tell folks about the real John McCain?but if we all pass this along, we can reach as many people as CNN Headline News does on a good night.
Click here to tell us how many people you can pass it on to?and to see our progress nationally:
10 things you should know about John McCain (but probably don't):
John McCain is not who the Washington press corps make him out to be. Please help get the word out?forward this email to your personal network. And if you want us to keep you posted on MoveOn's work to get the truth out about John McCain, sign up here:
1. "The Complicated History of John McCain and MLK Day," ABC News, April 3, 2008
"McCain Facts," ColorOfChange.org, April 4,
2. "McCain More Hawkish Than Bush on Russia,
China, Iraq," Bloomberg News, March 12, 2008
"Buchanan: John McCain 'Will Make Cheney Look
Like Gandhi,'" ThinkProgress, February 6, 2008
3. "McCain Sides With Bush On Torture Again,
Supports Veto Of Anti-Waterboarding Bill," ThinkProgress, February
4. "McCain says Roe v. Wade should be
overturned," MSNBC, February 18, 2007
5. "2007 Children's Defense Fund Action
Council® Nonpartisan Congressional Scorecard," February 2008
"McCain: Bush right to veto kids health
insurance expansion," CNN, October 3, 2007
6. "Beer Executive Could Be Next First Lady,"
Associated Press, April 3, 2008
"McCain Says Bank Bailout Should End `Systemic
Risk,'" Bloomberg News, March 25, 2008
7. "Will McCain's Temper Be a Liability?,"
Associated Press, February 16, 2008
"Famed McCain temper is tamed," Boston Globe,
January 27, 2008
8. "Black Claims McCain's Campaign Is Above
Lobbyist Influence: 'I Don't Know What The Criticism Is,'"
ThinkProgress, April 2, 2008
"McCain's Lobbyist Friends Rally 'Round Their
Man," ABC News, January 29, 2008
9. "McCain's Spiritual Guide: Destroy Islam,"
Mother Jones Magazine, March 12, 2008
"Will McCain Specifically 'Repudiate' Hagee's
Anti-Gay Comments?," ThinkProgress, March 12, 2008
"McCain 'Very Honored' By Support Of Pastor
Preaching 'End-Time Confrontation With Iran,'" ThinkProgress,
February 28, 2008
10. "John McCain Gets a Zero Rating for His
Environmental Record," Sierra Club, February 28, 2008
John McCain's Misstatements About The Iran/al Qaeda Connection
3-21-2008 Bill Maher?s New Rules went hard after John McCain for his repeated misstatements on the Iran/al Qaeda connection on Friday?s episode of Real Time:
New Rule: Old soldiers never die, they get young soldiers killed. This week John McCain said for the third time in two days, that Iran, a Shi?ite stronghold was training al Qaeda a militant Sunni organization. That the Hatfields of the Muslim world would be working with the McCoys is so not true even Dick Cheney hasn?t said it. Now the press, which loves McCain because he feeds them BBQ, dismissed this as just one of those senior moments. Not to worry, he?s only going to have his finger on the nuclear trigger. But it?s not just a ?gaffe,? it?s what McCain really thinks. And therein lies the paradox of this campaign: McCain?s strength is really his weakness. He?s a warrior who?s dumb about war. Whoever read The Art of War, chapter three of The Art of War says, ?Know thy enemy.? And John McCain plainly doesn?t. He thinks the solution is our presence in the Middle East. No, the problem is our presence in the Middle East. That?s why I don?t care if John McCain is better than Bush on global warming or torture or campaign finance, because he?s exactly the same as Bush on the war. They both don?t get the same thing. As long as we?re setting up shop in the heart of the Arab world, we?re not keeping America safer. Bin Laden goes ballistic over cartoons in Danish newspapers, and Goober and Grandpa want to put up a Hooters in Fallujah. They don?t ?hate us for our freedom,? they hate us for our fiefdom. Winning the War on Terror comes down to this: what will make us safer from pissed off Arab teenagers who are willing to die? There are a number of good answers to that question, but occupying their land for the next 100 years is not one of them.
Some people look at McCain and see a tough guy who is going to protect us from the ?Islamofascists.? I look at him and see a walking Tom Clancy action figure who is going to get us all killed. And yet a new poll shows that a majority of Americans believe John McCain is the candidate best qualified to answer when that red phone rings at 3:00 a.m., because he?d be up anyway, trying to pee. Yes, 55% of Americans think it?s McCain who should answer that phone, because they know John McCain is a warrior. He will not waver or hesitate. He will answer that phone and give the order that sends men to die and it will turn out to be a recording asking him if he?s happy with his mortgage.
Big Mac's Blazing Saddle Diplomacy
March 27, 2008
John McCain went before the Los Angeles World Affairs Council yesterday morning to showcase his foreign policy credentials and convince Americans that he is the only candidate experienced enough to take that 3am telephone call. While Clinton and Obama are distracted by a pre-Pennsylvania primary food fight, McCain's address constituted a dress rehearsal for a future national security agenda that, at its very core, resembles nothing more than discredited cowboy diplomacy. It is essentially fermented old failed warrior wine in new bottles...camouflaged unilateralism gussied up in a Potemkin village of storefront global engagement.
See: Mccain Foreign Policy
See: McCain Iraq
See: McCain Iraq 100 Years
Democrats should not ignore the content of McCain's speech while our internal bout continues, or remain passive at the free ride McCain will enjoy from a fawning media lauding the speech's "presidential" character and its perceived break with Bush/Cheney/Rice foreign policy catastrophes.
To remain impervious to McCain's attempted act at presidential statesmanship risks cementing in the minds of voters a dangerous perception that McCain will chart a new, more responsible and appealing foreign policy course that represents a break with neoconservatism orthodoxy.
Caveat Emptor: read between the lines!
First and foremost, McCain reasserts his ominous commitment to an endless engagement in Iraq. He justifies his bottomless pit commitment by arguing that a "premature" withdrawal will lead to a wider Middle East war because Al Qaeda will be able to turn Iraq into a cauldron of sectarian strife. This, he argues, will ultimately embolden Iran to confront Sunni Arab states and Israel, and lead to a regional war that will surely force the United States back into a wider conflict that it will have to wage against adversaries far stronger than they are today. In other words, the domino theory of Middle East extremism lies at the core of McCain's endless summer in Iraq.
McCain would like to convince voters they face the choice of accepting his Churchillian "never surrender" approach, or a dangerous Democratic "cut and run" alternative. In other words, leave Iraq and America will be in more danger and have to fight a more bloody and costly war later on many Middle East fronts, or stay the course in Iraq (courtesy of McCain's surge policy) and vanquish Al Qaeda and quell the sectarian tensions between Sunni and Shiites and we will be marginalize the threats arrayed against us throughout the region.
The trouble with this set up is that McCain's core premise is dead wrong. By our own senior commanders' accounts, Al Qaeda is but a minor player in Iraq, and there is no way the U.S. presence, surge or not, that will keep a lid on sectarian tensions. Just look at what is going on in Iraq at the very tragic milestone of 4,000 Americans killed: the worst sectarian violence in months has broken out with hundreds of lives lost despite a McCain's surge that he continues to tout as the fire extinguisher that will stop sectarian strife from igniting once again.
How inconvenient timing just when McCain keeps claiming that the surge has succeeded.
McCain's black and white version of the Middle East is what I find so troublesome. There is absolutely no redemption possible for adversaries such as Iran and Syria and no room for creative diplomacy other than his beloved surge strategy. In a nutshell, we must stay in Iraq to contain regional threats or risk engaging in a fool's errand by resorting to defeatist diplomacy.
I just don't buy that equation, and neither should the American people.
Moreover, McCain claims that an unending presence in Iraq can be legitimated by a new "League of Democracies" (a.k.a. a new Coalition of the Willing) that would conveniently marginalize those pesky international institutions such as the United Nations that seem to always stand in the way of American unilateralism or the McCain version "semi-unilateralism."
Creating parallel international organizations composed solely of "acceptable" democratic states would create a 21st century version of a new bi-polar world: A U.S./European Union plus India, Israel, Japan and other democracies lined up against Russia and other authoritarian governments. Democracies banding together to set a new global course has that soft, sweet appeal to our patriotic virtuosity, with every other undemocratic nation outside the McCain's democratic tent left to create their own mischief from the stage of the UN General Assembly, or create their own "anti-democratic" alliances and competing anti-democratic groupings.
What is so strikingly and inherently wrong with McCain's world vision is that America's global leadership will not be restored by ignoring adversaries that, left to their own devices, may further challenge and undermine America's national security.
Democrats should not permit McCain to gain further traction by falsely asserting he is charting a new foreign policy course that will restore America's image, global leadership, and reduce the threat posed by Al Qaeda and its spinoff terror groups. Despite McCain's assertion that he no warrior at heart, he is no prince of peace either. Any national security policy that, at its core, leaves America stranded in Iraq with hundreds of thousands of troops fighting whatever enemy we can conveniently label is a calling card for extremists and ultimately risks creating stronger adversaries. It is nothing more than a continuation of the failed Bush/Cheney/Rice status quo. The surge that McCain is so proud of will, by most impartial assessments, fail to stop the very civil strife that it is designed to prevent.
Sadly, there is nothing in McCain's speech that will convincingly steer our ship of state back on a truly righteous course that will undo the damage that the past seven years of failed national security policies have wrought. McCain is offering America nothing more than more of the same, and more of the same is what got America into this mess in the first place.
New York Times Breaks Long-Rumored Story on Alleged Relationship Between Sen. John McCain and Lobbyist Vicki Iseman.
In December of last year, Matt Drudge reported that John McCain -- who was then in the midst of a surprising comeback in the Republican presidential race -- was desperately trying to convince the New York Times to kill a story about "charges of giving special treatment to a lobbyist," and that McCain had hired a prominent attorney to work on his behalf. For the Arizona senator, who has built a good part of his reputation as a straight talker on his efforts toward campaign finance reform and cleaning up the lobbying culture in Washington, D.C., such a story could theoretically prove quite damaging.
Well, apparently we'll see just what kind of harm the story will do to McCain's campaign, as on Wednesday evening the Times published the article on its Web site. The Times piece, written by a team of reporters, suggests not just special treatment for the lobbyist in question -- Vicki Iseman, 40 -- but the possibility of a romantic relationship between the two, beginning in 1999.
"Convinced the relationship had become romantic, some of [McCain's] top advisers intervened to protect the candidate from himself -- instructing staff members to block [Iseman's] access, privately warning her away and repeatedly confronting him, several people involved in the campaign said on the condition of anonymity," the Times reports.
Both McCain and Iseman deny that their relationship was romantic. But the Times describes McCain's campaign at the time as being very worried about appearances when it came to the two. In February of 1999, the Times says, Mr. McCain and Ms. Iseman attended a small fund-raising dinner with several clients at the Miami-area home of a cruise-line executive and then flew back to Washington along with a campaign aide on the corporate jet of one of her clients, Paxson Communications. By then, according to two former McCain associates, some of the senator's advisers had grown so concerned that the relationship had become romantic that they took steps to intervene.
A former campaign adviser described being instructed to keep Ms. Iseman away from the senator at public events, while a Senate aide recalled plans to limit Ms. Iseman's access to his offices.
In interviews, the two former associates said they joined in a series of confrontations with Mr. McCain, warning him that he was risking his campaign and career. Both said Mr. McCain acknowledged behaving inappropriately and pledged to keep his distance from Ms. Iseman. The two associates, who said they had become disillusioned with the senator, spoke independently of each other and provided details that were corroborated by others.
The Times also reports on a meeting at D.C.'s Penn Station between Iseman and a former top strategist for McCain, John Weaver. Weaver told the Times that the conversation between himself and Iseman was about "her conduct and what she allegedly had told people, which made its way back to us," but did not provide further details. The Times says Iseman confirmed she met with Weaver, but disputed his account of what was said during it.
The Times' report is about more than just romance -- it also raises ethical questions. "In late 1999, Ms. Iseman asked Mr. McCain's staff to send a letter to the commission to help Paxson ... Mr. McCain complied. He sent two letters to the commission, drawing a rare rebuke for interference from its chairman," the Times says.
Unrelated to Iseman, the letters provoked a small controversy at the time, leading McCain's campaign to disclose four flights McCain had taken on jets owned by Paxson -- but not the flight he'd taken with Iseman.
As for Drudge, as might be expected for the conservative media guru, he's questioning the Times' timing; his banner headline on the article reads in his characteristic all caps manner, "NOW THAT HE'S SECURED NOMINATION: NYT DOWNLOADS ON MCCAIN."
Update: McCain's campaign has responded to the story. Communications Director Jill Hazelbaker issued a statement that reads:
It is a shame that the New York Times has lowered its standards to engage in a hit and run smear campaign. John McCain has a 24-year record of serving our country with honor and integrity. He has never violated the public trust, never done favors for special interests or lobbyists, and he will not allow a smear campaign to distract from the issues at stake in this election.
Americans are sick and tired of this kind of gutter politics, and there is nothing in this story to suggest that John McCain has ever violated the principles that have guided his career.
Is John McCain Secretly in the pockets of Lobbyists, and What about His Ethics and His Conflict of Interest?
If John McCain and Vicki Iseman were having sex, I say "bully for them." If more consenting adults would have more sex, the world would be a better place. But it's none of our business and does not belong on the front page of The New York Times, regardless of timing. What's more, the sex gets in the way of what is really important about McCain's behavior and why, in so many ways, the man is a complete fraud, however much the MSM may love every last wrinkle on his impressively active seven-decade-old body. For instance, we learn (as summarized by the AP):
In late 1999, McCain twice wrote letters to the Federal Communications Commission on behalf of Florida-based Paxson Communications -- which had paid Iseman as its lobbyist -- urging quick consideration of a proposal to buy a television station license in Pittsburgh. At the time, Paxson's chief executive, Lowell W. "Bud" Paxson, also was a major contributor to McCain's 2000 presidential campaign.
McCain did not urge the FCC commissioners to approve the proposal, but he asked for speedy consideration of the deal, which was pending from two years earlier. In an unusual response, then-FCC Chairman William Kennard complained that McCain's request "comes at a sensitive time in the deliberative process" and "could have procedural and substantive impacts on the commission's deliberations and, thus, on the due process rights of the parties."
McCain wrote the letters after he received more than $20,000 in contributions from Paxson executives and lobbyists. Paxson also lent McCain his company's jet at least four times during 1999 for campaign travel.
From the Times:
Mr. McCain promised, for example, never to fly directly from Washington to Phoenix, his hometown, to avoid the impression of self-interest because he sponsored a law that opened the route nearly a decade ago. But like other lawmakers, he often flew on the corporate jets of business executives seeking his support, including the media moguls Rupert Murdoch, Michael R. Bloomberg and Lowell W. Paxson, Ms. Iseman's client. (Last year he voted to end the practice.)
If you read Robert Bennett and Charlie Black's comments, as well as Drudge, it's clear that the unproved sex allegations will allow McCain to avoid the conflicts-of-interest stories that really ought to be at the heart of this issue. They will also use the Times' misleading reputation as a "liberal newspaper" to give them cover, as will most of the media's never-ending love affair with McCain, which is smartly documented in Ryan Lizza's terrific report here.
In the meantime, ask yourself: Why are these corporations spending hundreds of thousands of dollars of their shareholders' money to ferry McCain around the world? And does McCain think he's entitled to these trips without giving something in return. (And what would the children say about this?)
Suddenly, in September 2007, he's campaigning in South Carolina, the heavily Baptist state where George W. Bush barely managed to stop McCain's presidential campaign 8 years ago. And guess what? McCain tells a reporter "By the way, I'm not Episcopalian. I'm Baptist."
When pressed, he said he's attended the North Phoenix Baptist Church in Arizona for more than 15 years, though he has never been baptized in that church. Now see, that's exactly the problem. Baptism is kind of a big thing in the Baptist Church. (That's how they got the name.) No baptism, not Baptist.
Anyway, details aside, this is one very clear indication of how McCain has changed. Now, he's just another hungry politician, happy to pander if it helps him win. Which eliminates the very reason people were excited about him in 2000 -- his honesty.
McCain "Proud" of Endorsement From John Hagee Who Calls Catholics "The Great Whore."
February 29, 2008 | 02:14 PM (EST)
Tim Russert, in front of millions of Americans on Tuesday night, was quick to force Barack Obama to denounce Louis Farrakahn repeatedly until he worded it to Russert's satisfaction (evidently "unacceptable and reprehensible" didn't quite get the job done). Despite the fact that Obama never sought Farrakhan's endorsement, Russert felt this line of questioning was appropriate given Farrakhan's intolerant remarks about Jews in the past.
Okay, fair enough. But if that's the case, then why isn't he pressing John McCain about radical religious extremist uber-nut John Hagee?
Mr. McCain, who has been on a steady search for support among conservative and evangelical leaders who have long distrusted him, said he was "very honored'' by Mr. Hagee's endorsement. Asked about Mr. Hagee's extensive writings on Armageddon and about what one questioner said was Mr. Hagee's belief that the anti-Christ will be the head of the European Union, Mr. McCain responded that "all I can tell you is that I am very proud to have Pastor John Hagee's support.''
Notice the "been on a steady search" part. If Obama had actively sought Farrakhan's endorsement, his campaign would be over. McCain is downright proud of this Hagee endorsement.
Hagee was, if you'll remember, the guy who said that Hurricaine Katrina was God's revenge for a gay pride parade. He thinks war with Iran is essential so as to bring about Armageddon (when you can say bye-bye to the Jews). But as Glenn Greenwald says, he's a white Christian evangelical bigot, and therefore entitled to respect from the pundit class:
White evangelical Ministers are free to advocate American wars based on Biblical mandates, rant hatefully against Islam, and argue that natural disasters occur because God hates gay people. They are still fit for good company, an important and cherished part of our mainstream American political system. The entire GOP establishment is permitted actively to lavish them with praise and court their support without the slightest backlash or controversy. Both George Bush and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert sent formal greetings to the 2006 gathering of Hagee's group.
By contrast, black Muslim ministers like Farrakhan, or even black Christian ministers like Rev. Jeremiah Wright, are held with deep suspicion, even contempt. McCain is free to hug and praise the Rev. Hagees of the world, but Obama is required to prove over and over and over and over that he does not share the more extreme views of black Ministers.
How come Tim Russert -- in all the times he sits and chats with Lieberman, McCain and various high Bush officials -- never reads all of the inflammatory, disgusting, crazed "Rapture-is-Coming/ All-Jews-will-Burn/ Kill-All-Muslims/ Hurricanes-are-Punishment-against-Gays" pronouncements from John Hagee and James Dobson and Pat Robertson and demand that John McCain and George Bush and Joe Lieberman "denounce" those views and "reject" their support? What's the difference, exactly?
Yes, Mr. Catholic League/Chocolate Jesus
himself, who is (justifiably) miffed that Hagee refers to Catholics as "'The
Great Whore,' an 'apostate church,' the 'anti-Christ,' and a 'false cult
system.' Glenn Greenwald
interviewed him yesterday:
Donohue was particularly insistent that McCain's behavior would severely harm his standing with Catholic voters -- the group of voters which Karl Rove maintains is the key group for enabling the GOP to win: "This thing seems to be to be blowing up in his face. McCain has stepped in it big time."
It's significant that this is not a partisan issue, both sides of the political spectrum are in agreement that McCain should be forced to account for this. Even the National Review is applauding Glenn Greenwald's efforts on this front.
It's going to be hard for Russert to garner an audience to address this matter that is quite as big as he did in a Presidential debate, so I'm going to make a suggestion here that I never thought I would...
(*sharp intake of breath*)
...he needs to have Bill Donohue on Meet the Press.
Fair is fair, right?
Charles Keating was convicted of racketeering and fraud in both state and federal court after his Lincoln Savings & Loan collapsed, costing the taxpayers $3.4 billion. His convictions were overturned on technicalities; for example, the federal conviction was overturned because jurors had heard about his state conviction, and his state charges because Judge Lance Ito (yes, that judge) screwed up jury instructions. Neither court cleared him, and he faces new trials in both courts.)
Though he was not convicted of anything, McCain intervened on behalf of Charles Keating after Keating gave McCain at least $112,00 in contributions. In the mid-1980s, McCain made at least 9 trips on Keating's airplanes, and 3 of those were to Keating's luxurious retreat in the Bahamas. McCain's wife and father-in-law also were the largest investors (at $350,000) in a Keating shopping center; the Phoenix New Times called it a "sweetheart deal."
McCain has a reputation as a politician who has difficulty keeping his pants zipped, according to Republican sources. He acknowledges that his adultery broke up his first marriage. His second wife Cindy, the daughter of a wealthy Budweiser beer distributor, was addicted to prescription narcotics and even stole hard drugs from a medical charity that she ran. McCain acknowledges that she didn't want him to run, and only agreed once he promised that she doesn't have to go to New Hampshire or Iowa.
- Leonardo DiCaprio is "an androgynous wimp." -- McCain.
- "The thought of [McCain] being president sends a cold chill down my spine. He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and he worries me." -- Senator Thad Cochran of Mississippi, who has known McCain for 35 years.
"McCain Says He's Been Baptist For Years", by Bruce Smith, The
Associated Press, September 12, 2007
"Candidates invite questions about their faith", by Stephen Dinan, Washington Times, September 18, 2007
"The Pampered Politician", by Amy Silverman, The Phoenix New Times, May 15, 1997
"See John Run Off at the Mouth", Phoenix New Times, October 1, 1998
"Opiate for the Mrs.", Phoenix New Times, September 8, 1994
"Flashes: What's Up, Murdoch?", Phoenix New Times, September 17, 1998
the US Veteran's Dispatch web site.
"Symington Gets Slammer", Phoenix New Times, February 2, 1998
Election 98: Arizona Governor, Fox News web site, 1998 coverage (no longer on web)
"Keating Gets New Trial", CNNfn Web Site, December 2, 1996
"No More Wagging,", (editorial) by Maureen Dowd, The New York Times, January 3, 1999
"John McCain, rock-and-roll dad", by Andrew Essex, The New Yorker Magazine, December 6, 1999 p52
"Unmasking Darth McCain", by William Cleeland, The Daily Illini, March 9, 2001
"Famed McCain Temper is Tamed", By Michael Kranish Boston Globe, January 27, 2008
Back to the Home Page.
There have been visitors to this page since January 1, 1998
|For information on all
individuals and organizations listed in this website, or the name of a
contact person in your area that can give you further information on the
Religious Freedom Coalition of the Southeast, or the First Amendment
Coalition, contact us at
. Let us hear from you!
You may call also call us at 000-000-0000 If you access our voice mail, we will call you back collect if long distance.
Or, you can write to us at: RFCSE, P.O. Box 673206, Marietta, GA 30006-0036