![]() |
WAS BABY BUSH THE WORST PRESIDENT IN HISTORY? |
![]() |

HOME
| RICHARD M. SCAIFE | DICK ARMEY
| BOB BARR | GARY BAUER | DAN BURTON
PAT ROBERTSON
| ADOLPH COORS | JAMES
DOBSON | JERRY FALWELL
TOM DELAY | CHRISTIAN RECONSTRUCTIONISTS
Presented by the Religious Freedom and First Amendment Coalitions:
CLICK
HERE FOR BOOKS ABOUT GEORGE W BUSH!!!
"There ought to be limits QUOTE OF THE MONTH: "If you don't think it's a gamble to put a man in the White House who
believes we should have guns in church, who thinks the Taliban is a rock band, who was
such a failure as a businessman that his company was nicknamed "El-Busto," who
wants to turn our Social Security system into a Wall Street boiler room, who can't name a
single thing he disagrees with Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson on, who smeared a bona fide
hero named John McCain, and whose principle policy proposal is to give America's surplus
to the idle rich in the form of a $1.3 trillion tax cut, you're either nuts or a
Republican." |
| In January, just after OBAMA!'s election, we said we wouldn't mention Bush again, his departure having made him irrelevant. We only feel bad that he and his minions will apparently get away scot-free with their crimes; better they had all been brought up before a tribunal and tried for crimes against humanity in general and the U.S. Constitution in particular. But that is objectively true of almost all presidents since at least Lincoln. Most of the readers of this Web Page appear to be libertarians or classical liberals -- i.e., people who believe in a maximum of both social and economic freedom for the individual. The next largest group are "conservatives." It's a bit harder to define a conservative. Is it someone who atavistically just wants to conserve the existing order of things (either now, or perhaps as they perceived them 50, or 100, or 200, or however many years ago)? Or is a conservative someone who believes in limiting social freedoms (generally that means suppressing things like sex, drugs, outré clothing and customs, and bad-mouthing the government) while claiming to support economic freedoms (although with considerable caveats and exceptions)? It's unclear to me what, if any, philosophical foundation conservatism, by whatever definition, rests on. Which leads me to the question: Why do conservatives seem to have this warm and fuzzy feeling for George W. Bush? I can only speculate it's because Bush liked to talk a lot about freedom and traditional American values, and did so in such an ungrammatical way that it made him seem sincere. Bush's tendency to fumble words and concepts contrasted to Clinton's eloquence, which made him look "slick." I'm forced to the conclusion that what "conservatives" like about Bush is his style, such as it was. Because the only good thing I can recall that Bush ever did was to shepherd through some tax cuts. But even these were targeted and piecemeal, tossing bones to favored interests, rather than any principled abolition of any levies or a wholesale cut in rates. Is it possible that Bush was actually the worst president ever? I'd say he's a strong contender. He started out with a gigantic lie -- that he would cut the size of government, reduce taxes, and stay out of foreign wars -- and things got much worse from there. Let's look at just some of the highpoints in the catalog of disasters the Bush regime created.
The only reason I can imagine why a person who is not "evil" (to use a word he favored), completely uninformed, or thoughtless would favor Bush is because he wasn't a Democrat. Not that there's any real difference between the two parties anymore... As disastrous as he was, I rather hate to put him in competition for "worst president" in the company of Lincoln, McKinley, Wilson, the two Roosevelts, Truman, Johnson, and Nixon. He is simply too small a character -- psychologically aberrant, ignorant, unintelligent, shallow, duplicitous, small-minded -- to merit inclusion in any list. On second thought, looking over that list of his personal characteristics, he's probably most like FDR, except he lacked FDR's polish and rhetorical skills. I suspect he'll just fade away as a non-entity, recognized as an embarrassment. Not even worth the trouble of hanging by his heels from a lamp post, although Americans aren't (yet) accustomed to doing that to their leaders. Those who once supported him will, at least if they have any circumspection and intellectual honesty, feel shame at how dim they were to have been duped by a nobody. The worst shame of Bush -- worse than the spending, the new agencies, the torture, or the wars -- is that he used so much pro-liberty and pro-free-market rhetoric in the very process of destroying those institutions. That makes his actions ten times worse than if an avowed socialist had done the same thing. People will blame the full suite of disasters Bush caused on the free market simply because Bush constantly said he believed in it. And he's left OBAMA! with a fantastic starting point for what I expect to be even greater intrusions into your life and finances. Eventually, the Bush era will look like The Good Old Days. But only in the way that the Romans looked back with nostalgia on Tiberius and Claudius after they got Caligula. And then Nero. And then the first of many imperial coups and civil wars |
There have been visitors to this site.
DISCLAIMER: The Religious Freedom Coalition of the Southeast (RFCSE) is a non-advocacy Religious site paid for with volunteer labor and edited by Rebecca, a non-affiliated U.S. citizen. The RFCSE site is being hosted by the Association of Cymry Wicca, a religious organization based in Marietta GA, the RFCSE Web site was published beginning on February 1, 1999. No Permission is required by the RFCSE, for reprinting. But permission by originating authors may be needed. The duration of the working links are not under our control. RFCSE has not reviewed all of the sites linked to our site and is not responsible for the content of any off-site pages or any other sites linked to our site. Your linking to any other off-site pages or other sites from our site is at your own risk. Our Original Web Master, an associate died after a threat from a Hacker who did not appreciate Religious Freedom. Before she died, she asked us to continue her Religious Freedom Page. We will. Even though we have been attacked by Right Wing extremists, we still exist because of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, who were deists (not Christians), helped frame the Constitution of The United States of American and placed language in the First Amendment to guarantee Religious Rights for all Americans. We will uphold that tradition. |
|
For information on
all individuals and organizations listed in this website, or the name of a contact person
in your area that can give you further information on the Religious Freedom Coalition of
the Southeast, or the First Amendment Coalition, contact us at Rachel RFCSE@hotmail.com. Let us hear from you! You may also call us at (000) 000-0000 If you access our voice mail, we will call you back collect if long distance. Or, you can write to Rachel at: RFCSE, P.O. Box 672125, Marietta, GA 30006-0036 |
Return to the Religious Freedom Homepage
| This site was created by the Religious Freedom
Coalition of the Southeast and the Georgia First Amendment Coalition design copyright 1998 an associate |